[Hoot Gibson]

Again, I didn't say they were. I said they could have been. Or, may have been. It wouldn't be the first time a killer tried to cover up a murder.

In your opinion, after closely watching the testimony in this trial, is there any "reasonable doubt" that Zimmerman's wounds were inflicted by Martin? Are you really confident enough that is what happened in this case that if you were on that jury you would vote to convict him and possibly send him to prison for the rest of his life. Do you really believe the words that you are typing here to the extent that you would deprive another human being of their liberty?

Because if Martin did slam Zimmerman's head into the concrete, what reasonable man would not be fearing for his own life at that point?