[TheRealVille]

Thank you for asking. Yes, it is very much different. I freely admit that I often vote for the lesser of two evils when I vote for the Republican candidate. that was true when I voted for McCain, Romney, and every single time that I voted for Hal Rogers. I often don't like the alternatives that Republicans offer to the liberal Democrats on the ballot, but as long as the Democratic Party insists on putting forward liberal candidates committed to destroying our way of life, then I will vote against them.

Unlike you, I am a frequent critic of Republicans and write this down - I will vote for no Republican who votes in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens. The Republican Party seems to be self-destructing and if that is what they continue to do, then I will begin to help them by withholding my votes.

You on the other hand, have shown a willingness to lie and repeat the lies of the DNC to help dishonest Democrats win elections. If you believe that is in the best interest of this country, then I have nothing but pity for you and others like you.

The only poll taken since Grimes announced she was running is the one poll that you represented as three polls. However, Republicans paid for one last month:

2014 Kentucky Senate GE - McConnell 47%, Grimes 40% (Wenzel Strategies 6/1-6/2)

Obama is even less popular in Kentucky than he was when he won reelection last year. He has escalated the war on coal and it is extremely unlikely that Grimes will be able to run away from Obama's fast enough to beat an incumbent Republican Senator, or at least that is what Nate Silver said in the fourth article that you misrepresented as a poll showing the two candidates tied. You really should start reading the articles to which you link.

Republicans paid for the one you post? How is your poll any different than mine?