[zaga_fan]

• good fatch zaga, but as a movie, it would hage created a charefter not recognizable by anything that man knows of today. It would hage added several more minutes to describe, thus I have no issue with them showing what was the end result. Its just like today, people were wondering where the apple was. The bible does not mention an apple. But it was not as much of somethng that would have needed definition versus what would have had to have been explained in the movie to describe a legged snake.

To your point, it was at this time that God said that the serpent will slither on the earth with no legs, eating the dust of the earth. Thus, was a serpent nothing more than a fanged lizard?

I know what you mean...
but I would have been fine with them showing some type of legged-lizard and moving on with the scene and not explaining it.

If it confused anyone, they would ask about it and someone could let them in on why it was like that. Heck, they may even pick up the good book and read about it themselves.