Thread Rating:
01-25-2006, 11:24 AM
pete rose Wrote:with hazard losing 12 player how will they fair in the 06 season
12 players is not really all that many.
Plus, I hear they're doing a MUCH better job "convincing" the athletic bball players to play football now.
The big, athletic Frosh that started on Defense last year was a STUD and looks to be a D-1 kid one day.
Obviously will be big shoes to fill at QB, but in their system, as long as they have an ATHLETIC QB that can at least be accurate with the SHORT passes, quick receivers to make you miss in the open field, and ONE tough running back, they won't need another Olinger-type.
I've heard the line they have coming back is working hard. Anybody have any numbers and names on how their kids are doing in the weight room?
Messages In This Thread
how good is hazard after a big loss - by OJ Simpson - 01-21-2006, 05:29 PM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by Ravens#52 - 01-21-2006, 08:05 PM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by s.w.a.t. - 01-21-2006, 09:25 PM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by ShakeandBake - 01-22-2006, 04:43 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by OU_Bruiser - 01-25-2006, 04:07 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by football_#1 - 01-25-2006, 04:27 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by Football24_7 - 01-25-2006, 11:24 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by unda-taka - 01-29-2006, 04:23 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by unda-taka - 01-29-2006, 04:25 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by OU_Bruiser - 01-29-2006, 06:26 AM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by Lattimer_99 - 01-29-2006, 01:56 PM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by LBJ23 - 02-15-2006, 04:00 PM
how good is hazard after a big loss - by Football24_7 - 02-15-2006, 04:22 PM
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)