Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are first round playoff games necessary? (This Weeks Playoff Format Rant)
#60
rebel 4 life Wrote:I would reather get my brainsbeat in then not to play listin to yourself 3rd seed holy cross lost to 2rd seed lloyd by a point ur way they wouldnt be in the playoff or what about conner,cooper,scott three way tie that would just be plain wrong dude

Excuse me but WHY is that just wrong? Why is that any more wrong
than the simple fact that the are in fact a 3 seed now despite losing by
only one. I'm sure there's a #1 seed that won the clincher in OT,
so why isn't it just as wrong that the other team is the #2? And
if that's wrong, then how bout the handful of districts with more than
4 teams, is n't it just as wrong that the fifth place team that
lost to the 4th place team by a point is excluded? Your point is
DEVOID of logic.I believe I read that currently 88% off all teams
are included. So why in the world not just put them all in, how
does it make sense to exclude 12%? Getting a playoff berth
should MEAN something, not just the result of merely being in a
district.
Messages In This Thread
Are first round playoff games necessary? (This Weeks Playoff Format Rant) - by Observing - 11-01-2012, 09:40 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)