Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are first round playoff games necessary? (This Weeks Playoff Format Rant)
#21
Avery Bullock Wrote:Dude, take your meds! Down, boy... DOWN!!

I needed a team to use as an example and just picked Williamsburg so no one else would be offended that I had used THEIR favorite team.

I'm sure Jenkins will come down and give the Jackets as good a game as they can but I don't think it will matter much. The Jackets will score my IQ and Jenkins will score yours.

The only sensible suggestion I've heard on this thread was made by EKUAlum05 who offered the idea of giving the #1 seed a first round bye and go ahead and play the 2 vs 3 game.

It seems that everybody makes the playoffs using the current system. All four teams in our district did. We may as well just do away with the classes and seed the teams alphabetically... Adair County vs. Woodford County, Allen Central vs. Williamsburg (already played that one), Allen County-Scottsville vs. Whitley County, etc.
How does allowing four teams per district into the playoffs make Kentucky football weaker. Indiana allows all teams into its playoff system and I don't think that many people would argue that the quality of Kentucky high school football is on the same level as Indiana's is.

The more experience that players get on the field, the better the players and teams will be after four years. Playoff experience, whether a team wins or loses, is often a springboard to greater success the following season.

It makes no sense to eliminate football games from the schedule. There are too many classes in Kentucky's system but not too many playoff games.
Messages In This Thread
Are first round playoff games necessary? (This Weeks Playoff Format Rant) - by Hoot Gibson - 10-30-2012, 12:41 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)