[ronald reagan]

You have no right to tell a woman what she can do with her body medically, the same as you have no right making medical decisions about my body. It's private between all of us, just between us and our doctors. It all goes back to the viable argument that you and others want to dismiss.

So you would support your wife aborting your child without your say so? Its private and all.

And based upon the above, you'd be in total support of banning ALL abortions if the baby is viable? Because if you believe its alive at that point, as you've stated or insinuated on numerous occasions..... it'd technically be murder.

What I don't understand about your arguement, mostly because its just BS, but thats another matter.... Here's what I get out of what you and others say in regards to 'exceptions'.
1)Its wrong to have an abortion as a form of birth control. This is likely because you think its evil, or better yet, murder. There really is no other option. If you think its wrong and are against it, then there is compelling evidence to you that there's a moral or legal implication involved.
2)Baby's that are products of rape or incest.... don't matter. Reason number 1 doesn't apply. They are not 'worth as much'. Whats the fear of having a baby as the result of rape? The baby will inherit the rape gene? Or come out with a swastika on its forehead?
3)If you support them in regards to rape.... then would you agree that rape must be PROVEN? or else you risk having women left and right saying they were raped, in order to have an abortion that you believe personally is wrong? That opens wide the door for thousands of innocent men daily to be accused of rape.
4)You are very confused about what you believe because you can't possibly find it in you to oppose evil when it has a (D) beside of it.