[old_school_hero]

I'm going to chime in on more time with some intelligent/factual information and anybody who 'actually' was at the game on Friday would have a hard time disputing it.

Bourbon Co. did not put together a sustainable drive the entire night. Their 3 offensive touchdowns came on 3 big plays which covered 201 yards of their 346 total yards. The other 36 plays that Bourbon ran netted them only 145 yards.

Garrard ran 58 plays to Bourbon's 39 and ended up with more first downs, 13, compared to Bourbon's 8 for the entire game.

Garrard controlled the clock and field position for most of the night.

Heading into the last couple minutes of the 3rd quarter the score was Garrard 8, Bourbon 6.

One would be hard to argue that up until the bottom fell out for Garrard, Garrard outplayed Bourbon for almost the first 3 quarters.

So, let me head you haters off at the pass with some cliche's that I am sure will be thrown out there in response to this....
1.) the only thing that matters is the final score
2.) big time teams make big time plays
3.) blah blah blah....
4.) sounds like more sour grapes...

Speaking of 'sour grapes'...I do believe Hodge put in for the Garrard job after Stonebreaker left....and he didn't get it...just saying. So maybe that, as well as they didn't beat GC as bad as they thought they were going to maybe contributed to what happened in the last 1:30 of the game.....

With all that being said.....I'm done with this topic.