Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20
#19
HG_Bullfrogs Wrote:I have never understood the infactuation with Irwin, he was 2-2 against North, went 2-9 one year and barely had a 500% winning percentage at 24-20. Look back at the schedule they beat the same small teams then that people are complaining about beating right now. Its not the coaches in Laurel County doing good or bad, it's much more.
Majority of teams South beat in those years was mint homers who wasn't very good. Whitley want very good and the throw Harrodsburg, Leslie, and other smaller schools in the mix. His claim to fame I guess was beating Corbin multiple times but Corbin was not very good the either. Resounds lost a ton of games during tehise years and winning only district games against poor teams. Just saying I don't understand the Irwin comparison wiyh greatness. I don't recall us ever beating anyone we shouldn't have those years.

South was really tough under the Irwin years. I compare it the Stepp years at Clay County. They are both good coaches.
Messages In This Thread
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by GetChili - 10-05-2012, 11:53 PM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by E's Army - 10-05-2012, 11:56 PM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by GetChili - 10-05-2012, 11:57 PM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by E's Army - 10-06-2012, 12:04 AM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by E's Army - 10-06-2012, 10:16 AM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by SLHSCard - 10-06-2012, 12:19 PM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by E's Army - 10-07-2012, 07:58 AM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by FIRST - 10-07-2012, 09:52 AM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by E's Army - 10-07-2012, 12:50 PM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by TheTigersEye - 10-07-2012, 03:22 PM
Lincoln County 63, South Laurel 20 - by 00delk - 10-08-2012, 10:52 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)