[Observing]

Billy G didn't reduce Kentucky's relevance when he drank his way to an NIT bid?

I don't think I've tried to portray BCG as good for UK.
I merely said that he was able to land Patterson and
get performance the first year from players that Tubby
couldn't, thta managed to allow us to avoid an almost
certain LOSING record(no NIT, no NUTHIN) had Tubby
returned for one more year. One can argue whether
Pat would have come had Tubby remained, but is
anyone going to seriously maitain that team without
Pat, with BCG or Tub, was going to have a winning record?

And one could argue that after 3 years Tubby was finally
going to figure it out, and get some solid contributions
from Bradley and Crawford. A rational person wouldn't
expect that, but I suppose one could argue it.