[FBALL]

Fball. seems like your problem is a myopia regarding the NBA. It does
NOT matter what any of the players did as a pro, vis a vis what they
were in college. Larry Johnson was probably the best PRO out
of all the palyers on the teams under discussion. But the discussion
is about the best COLLEGIATE team. Vegas was NOT as good as 96
UK. It's not close.

Your problem is you don't know what you are talking about. You really think Larry Johnson was a better pro than Patrick Ewing? Not to mention the UCLA teams and Houston.

The fact that those teams had better pro players than the 96 cats is only one variable. You can whine about the shot clock all you want. A shot clock would have helped that Georgetown team. They were thugs. Now you want to say that the team that Georgetown beat is better than they were? That goes against your own arguments.