[tvtimeout]

True to form, you couldn't be more off base with these three responses. But, I'll play one last time.


Your first- does the term self explanatory have any meaning for you?

Your second- all I said about Romney was he wasn't a slave to some extremist socio-political doctrine like progressivism. Therefore, I contend he will govern from the middle.

Your third- your posts are filled with ravings about Romney and Republicrats, while you have allowed the Democrats their dignity by your predictable and conspicious omissions of any criticisms about them. It's odd in the extreme for a third party outlander like yourself, to continually berate only half of the political establishment. Therefore I assume you don't have that much objection with the Obama Administration and their bent toward social justice, redistribution of wealth and the rest of the progressive agenda, which they openly espouse.

Point One: Romney Care is in the middle?

Point Two: Romney value only what the polls tell him to value...reminds me of another president

Point Three: I strongly disagree with the policies of the Obama administration starting with the Czars and the creation of other federal bureacracies... I hate that unemployement insureance has been available for 3 years running. I think that the "War on Poverty" has failed, just like the "War on Drugs". I also believe that the governments only role is to ensure personal liberty of each of its citizens. I think that privatization is the best source of capitalism. Republicans forgot capitalism 4 years ago...period. Free market, my hindend.

I am sure that you and I agree on point three: however, I disagree with you on the military issue.

Now another question if you go far left on any road, how do you correct your path?

One more question if you do go far left and it looks like you go back to the right but you just went slightly what have you accomplished?