[Hoot Gibson]

I answered that question in another thread yesterday.

So, Ron Paul is a pragmatist who understands that his best chance to bring about change is to work within the party that best reflects his set of beliefs. Yet, you support Ron Paul, ridicule the Republican Party, and claim that there are no differences between the two parties. Do you think that Ron Paul's decision to spend his political career as a member of the GOP was simply an arbitrary decision? Would he be equally as comfortable in the Democratic Party? Do you expect him to throw away his vote by abstaining or voting for a presidential candidate who is not a member of the Republican Party?

It sounds like you, like many other Ron Paul fanatics, are dismissing the good example that he has set for you.