[mr.charlie hustle]

A poster has accused the head coach of being drunk on the job. As for precedent if you have a reference to the case handy then I would be interested in seeing it. I know that th website may be protected against an action but I don't believe that there are any laws that shield individuals who wrongfully defame somebody's character, which is a threat to their livelihood, BTW, from legal action.

As for breaking rules, you must be kidding. This has become a website with many moderators and almost no moderation. Whether rules have been broken, or rules have been broken and simply not enforced is really irrelevant. Garbage like this is not good for websites and should not be tolerated.

I certainly agree with you HG. I do however believe that an alledged improprity especially when it ultimately concerns public funds and perhaps the health and welfare of minors should have an administrative review which I feel certain will or has taken place. School systems are most professional and it is very unlikely that their business would be aired in a venue such as this especially being such as it is. If there are problems per KRS 208.020 they will I am sure be considered. If allegiations are found to be untrue and made with malice against people by people then you have to hope that matter can be resolved. The "General Public" does not need to know everything. Does the constitution cover freedom to gossip as well as speech?