[BIG FAN #1]

Well if the coaching staff is playing them over sophomores, and juniors there has to be a reason. Either they are better, or are simply working harder. Being an upperclassman should not exempt a player from being replaced by a younger kid, if the younger kid is showing more effort on the floor, and working harder in practice then as a coach you have to reward that with playing time. It might not be the popular desicion but it is the right one.

I agree with that but what im saying is what if the coaches are just trying to get the younger kids more experience and taking the upperclassmen out not because they are better at this point and time but so they will be better in years to come