Thread Rating:
12-05-2011, 11:08 AM
I am a fan of an 8-team playoff.
SEC, Big-10, Pac-12, Big-12, ACC, and 3-At-large teams. I don't care about the Big East, Big Sky, etc....
OR the top 8 BCS ranked teams, regardless or Conference, I think I like that better. If the Pac-12 champ is 7-3, why should they get in over a team like UGA? Yeah, top 8 BCS ranked teams.
7 total games over 7-weeks. Start the tourney 2 weeks after all Conference title games, to give teams a bye-week. (Start December 10 end on January 14, five days after regularly scheduled finish.) Have other bowl games on each of those days as well. Have each game don a sponsor name (1-8 called the Tostito's bowl, 2-7 called the Sprint Bowl, 3-6 called the Go-daddy.com bowl, 4-5 called the Fiesta Bowl, winner of 1-8 and 4-5 called the Orange Bowl, winner of 2-7 and 3-6 called the Rose Bowl, championship game called the whatever BCS national Champion bowl and have them rotate names every year, etc...) this keeps all the sponsorship money, increases interest which increases ratings which increase sponsorship money, gives a true national champion and quites the rublings of the Auburn's, Boise's, etc... of the world.
SEC, Big-10, Pac-12, Big-12, ACC, and 3-At-large teams. I don't care about the Big East, Big Sky, etc....
OR the top 8 BCS ranked teams, regardless or Conference, I think I like that better. If the Pac-12 champ is 7-3, why should they get in over a team like UGA? Yeah, top 8 BCS ranked teams.
7 total games over 7-weeks. Start the tourney 2 weeks after all Conference title games, to give teams a bye-week. (Start December 10 end on January 14, five days after regularly scheduled finish.) Have other bowl games on each of those days as well. Have each game don a sponsor name (1-8 called the Tostito's bowl, 2-7 called the Sprint Bowl, 3-6 called the Go-daddy.com bowl, 4-5 called the Fiesta Bowl, winner of 1-8 and 4-5 called the Orange Bowl, winner of 2-7 and 3-6 called the Rose Bowl, championship game called the whatever BCS national Champion bowl and have them rotate names every year, etc...) this keeps all the sponsorship money, increases interest which increases ratings which increase sponsorship money, gives a true national champion and quites the rublings of the Auburn's, Boise's, etc... of the world.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Messages In This Thread
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by TidesHoss32 - 12-04-2011, 11:00 PM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by zaga_fan - 12-04-2011, 11:09 PM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by TidesHoss32 - 12-04-2011, 11:18 PM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by NothingTrivial - 12-04-2011, 11:33 PM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by Stardust - 12-05-2011, 01:32 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by zaga_fan - 12-05-2011, 02:48 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by RunItUpTheGut - 12-05-2011, 02:58 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by PaintsvilleTigerfan - 12-05-2011, 03:03 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by zaga_fan - 12-05-2011, 10:42 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by judgementday - 12-05-2011, 10:44 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by LWC - 12-05-2011, 11:08 AM
How the NCAA Playoffs Could Have Looked - by Stardust - 12-05-2011, 01:06 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)