[V_SoSpiffy]

Well we will just have to agree to disagree. I understand what you are saying about the age difference but I think you are disregarding the obvious skill and talent advantage that Trinity would have. Trinity IMO would have the most talented players on the field.

A better analogy may be a team like Alabama or LSU playing against a CFL or Arena League team. The arena league team would be older and more experienced but they would be the leftovers that the NFL didn't want. Much like NAIA players or high school players that the D1 and D1 teams didn't want.

sir you are just not very smart if you think that trinity 1. would be the most talented team on the field and 2. they would win. The biggest difference will be on the lines. Have you seen trinity play? They have two 6 foot 200 pound guards. Very good players at this level but how do you think that will translate to the college game? So who will block the 300+ pound defensive tackles? Not one team in kentucky would lose to trinity. Not one. they would get the spanking of a lifetime. As far as talent goes yes they are talented but I doubt tht they are more talented than teams i've seen play in NAIA. Most are d1 players that didn't qualify with the extra 2 or 3 years in the weight room as well. absurd statement :HitWall: