[Altro Cat]

Can not compare basketball to football. The physical difference in football far out ways the physical difference in basketball. Have you ever been to an NAIA college football game? There is a lot of D1 talent on the field every Saturday. Georgetown, Cumberlands, Lindsey Wilson, and Pikeville would absolutely CRUSH Trinity. The physical strength of the MEN in 2nd, 3rd or 4th year of college would be a world apart from KIDS in high school. An 18-19 high school player may be strong but nothing compared to a 21-24 old man. Plus the fact that no one on those college teams plays both sides of the ball. They work on one position, with a position coach, every day of their career. This allows the college team to remain fresh for 4 quarters. Their bodies are more mature and just bigger, stronger and faster than the high schoolers.
Trinity playing a college team... ANY college team... would be like a very good high school team, say Trinity, playing a high school JV team.
Trinity is an outstanding high school team but, let's be realistic, they are a HIGH SCHOOL team.

Well we will just have to agree to disagree. I understand what you are saying about the age difference but I think you are disregarding the obvious skill and talent advantage that Trinity would have. Trinity IMO would have the most talented players on the field.

A better analogy may be a team like Alabama or LSU playing against a CFL or Arena League team. The arena league team would be older and more experienced but they would be the leftovers that the NFL didn't want. Much like NAIA players or high school players that the D1 and D1 teams didn't want.