Thread Rating:
12-23-2005, 07:41 PM
The Heels really lost their composure at the end.They looked and played like a team that had never been exposed to a tough situation(maybe because they haven't).I thought that they did a pretty good job until the enormous run to end the game,but they did not play smart ball once the Trojans got a good lead on them.
I think USC did a superb job on defense,but I have not seen enough of them to be sold on them being a good team.It looks to me that they lack size and they rely almost completely on their wings.There were a lot of mismatches in this game and it just seems to me that USC took better advantages of the ones that favored them.I thought that Hansbrough had a clear advantage inside,but that only counts if you take advantage of it.
I think USC did a superb job on defense,but I have not seen enough of them to be sold on them being a good team.It looks to me that they lack size and they rely almost completely on their wings.There were a lot of mismatches in this game and it just seems to me that USC took better advantages of the ones that favored them.I thought that Hansbrough had a clear advantage inside,but that only counts if you take advantage of it.
![[-]](https://bluegrassrivals.com/forum/images/lifestyle/collapse.png)
Messages In This Thread
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by crazytaxidriver - 12-22-2005, 06:51 PM
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by -STAT- - 12-22-2005, 07:18 PM
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by StrikeoutKing - 12-22-2005, 08:26 PM
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by Batpuff - 12-22-2005, 11:10 PM
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by toolbox - 12-23-2005, 07:21 PM
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by #_4 - 12-23-2005, 07:24 PM
UNC 59 vs USC 74 - by Time_2_Game - 12-23-2005, 07:41 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
