Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th)
#18
What's wrong with sending a kid to a smaller school such as Cumberland or Union? That's a success in my opinion. You want everyone to go to D-1 and that's great, but you can't limit yourself and consider sending a kid to an NAIA school a failure. You do realize that holding a kid back is not mandatory don't you? It's a parental/player decision. So if you're telling me that there are absolutely no students/athletes at the school you follow or coach at that's been held back, in any level, you're crazy.
Messages In This Thread
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Cheezy - 09-02-2011, 08:15 AM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by barrel - 09-02-2011, 09:14 AM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Wildcat18 - 09-02-2011, 03:59 PM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by bluedad - 09-02-2011, 05:17 PM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Cheezy - 09-02-2011, 05:44 PM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Cheezy - 09-03-2011, 12:23 PM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by bluedad - 09-04-2011, 10:52 AM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Unregistered - 09-04-2011, 09:55 PM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Cheezy - 09-05-2011, 12:29 AM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by bluedad - 09-05-2011, 01:08 AM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Unregistered - 09-05-2011, 10:46 AM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by Unregistered - 09-05-2011, 06:32 PM
Pulaski Northern 60- Lex Cath 6 (8th) - by new o - 09-05-2011, 09:03 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)