[Wildcatk23]

I've read my history. Most slaves were treated well. Owned by a family of means usually, and often they were well thought of. The point was in the old days slavery was common place though not acceptable to us and, most owners were not mean to them. I doubt you're qualified to criticize rhe validity of that perspective.

Realville, far as I'm concerned you just siezed on an opportunity you thought Wildcat 23 created for you. One of these days you might come out of that fogbank you're in and start thinking for yourself. Like I said before, when the race card is played the liberal will raise his voice because he knows it's the in thing to do.

Amun-Ra don't take my word for whether or not the NYT is liberal or not, how about Daniel Okrent's opinion? LINK--- http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/opinio...paper.html
A couple of these guys running would do a good job. Whoever gets elected better be strong enough to deal with the runaway spending.

The Majority of slaves was not treated well. The fact that someone else bought another human being and somehow thought it was ok to work them is in know way treating someone well. Even the slaves that weren't beat and whipped still worked from dusk to dawn in plantation fields, factories, Other jobs that they was not paid or compensated for.

Yes there was some slaves that was released and worked in doors for the "Master".