[Dungy]

Respectfully disagree. Loss of a large graduating class or several great players clearly merit a great team from last year not being rated as highly the following pre-season. Likewise, many returning players that may have started as underclassmen last year should signify a better team the following year.

I do agree on proving as the season goes along, which is what I think about Hazard and Corbin. Not quite as good as last year early on, but will likely get close to that level during the season.

Also agree about Rockcastle and readily said I am unfamiliar, just can't think of any other team to put in there, and two posters already agreed they have a lot coming back.