Thread Rating:
03-05-2011, 02:50 PM
Brooks4Prez Wrote:Would being nationally ranked and beating top ten teams be considered relevant to you? That has happened in the last few years. Not saying they have the rich tradition of the football gods of Mountaineer country or anything; just wondering.:moon:
Oh that's right, y'all had Timmy Ouch.:lmao:
Messages In This Thread
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Aslan - 03-04-2011, 03:47 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Stardust - 03-04-2011, 05:09 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Jarons - 03-04-2011, 06:06 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by outdoorsman43 - 03-04-2011, 06:16 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Aslan - 03-04-2011, 06:18 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Jarons - 03-04-2011, 06:33 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by dangerousdaneerfan - 03-04-2011, 07:57 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by vundy33 - 03-04-2011, 11:22 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Brooks4Prez - 03-05-2011, 11:50 AM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Stardust - 03-05-2011, 12:09 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Wildcatk23 - 03-05-2011, 12:57 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by dangerousdaneerfan - 03-05-2011, 02:50 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by outdoorsman43 - 03-05-2011, 02:58 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by zaga_fan - 03-05-2011, 03:03 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Brooks4Prez - 03-06-2011, 08:25 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by HawksRule - 03-07-2011, 01:01 AM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by Joneslab - 03-10-2011, 10:21 PM
UK had $253,396 deficit for Birmingham bowl - by cougarpride08 - 03-11-2011, 09:20 AM
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)