[Coach E]

If this is the case, this is no different that the Mitchel case at Highlands back in 2004 and everyone knows how that mess turned out. I believe Highlands get back back their wins just last year that the KHSAA took away in 2004.

No, the difference was that Mitchel's family never actually lived in the apartment (if memory serves me right), which means they still lived in the original address, or out of district. If the kid and his family move across town, and have the other place under contract, they SHOULD be ok...but like an earlier post said, the KHSAA can get the same two cases and rule them differently. In which the family would be able to appeal.

I have noticed over the past 15 years that the KHSAA is much more like an insurance company, deny first, then see if anybody contests it. You could always just get a circut court judge to rule you eligible and overrule the KHSAA!