Thread Rating:
12-14-2010, 01:57 AM
Amun-Ra Wrote:There were alot of times when Favre would come in, hurt, play the first half and set out the rest of the game. Also I think Peyton will break his streak.
Cal's I think is better. You might not get hit in baseball but it is stilla strain on the body, especially playing shortstop and third. Moving to your sides diving and stretching to make plays can put a strain on your muscles. Now imagine doing that everyday. Never missing work for 2,632 days. Thats doesn't include spring training.
Last time I said this people went crazy on here. But, a few of the names I mentioned have already been made public, so here it goes.
He played in a time when the juice and other substances weren't on the banned list. That's why I say that there is no way I guy can go out and play day in and day out like that without some type of "assistance". That is A LOT of abuse on the body.
Most of the guys, not all, btu most from that era used something a little extra. Things weren't banned or tested for then so, Why not?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
âRelax, all right? Donât try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, theyâre fascist. Throw some ground balls â itâs more democratic.â
Crash Davis
Messages In This Thread
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by TidesHoss32 - 12-13-2010, 08:08 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Aslan - 12-13-2010, 08:12 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Spud6 - 12-13-2010, 08:42 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Wildcatk23 - 12-13-2010, 09:23 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by LWC - 12-13-2010, 09:33 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Wildcatk23 - 12-13-2010, 10:04 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by TidesHoss32 - 12-13-2010, 10:25 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by OffTheHook - 12-14-2010, 12:43 AM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Amun-Ra - 12-14-2010, 12:55 AM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by OffTheHook - 12-14-2010, 01:57 AM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by MVP2 - 12-14-2010, 04:24 AM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Westside - 12-14-2010, 08:25 AM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Stardust - 12-14-2010, 08:31 AM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by zaga_fan - 12-14-2010, 02:12 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Wildcatk23 - 12-14-2010, 05:23 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Douglas Mullins - 12-14-2010, 10:16 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by zaga_fan - 12-16-2010, 06:01 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by Jarons - 12-16-2010, 07:40 PM
More Impressive? Favres 297 or Ripkens 2,632? - by vundy33 - 12-17-2010, 12:21 AM
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)