[Tomcat68]

The problem with your argument here though is that your idea of recruiting and what we do is totally different.

Do we advertise in local religious publications. Yes

Do we advertise in local papers. Yep

Do we have a pee-wee football team? Hell yes we do.

Is this recruiting? Absolutely not. It costs 5000 dollars a year to go to NCC, we have to advertise our school and what it offers.

I go back to the car reference, if a car company did not advertise would they survive? Nope.

If someone was giving away cars, for free. And we were giving away the exact same car under the exact same rules, but had to charge 5000 dollars for it, do you think we'll get the same customer base as you? Ridiculous.

Show me some facts and you have an argument, until then it is strictly mindless, biased, unproven thoughts from your mind.

And once again that isn't recruiting. But when a coach or his staff goes and personally visits a player, takes him out to dinner, offers to somehow find a way to get his tuition paid for, somehow finds the young man spending money, finds him a person chaufer, etc, that is. And that is a problem. Do I know of any of these personal instances from any type of a reliable source? Outside of what happened at Rose Hill, no. But there is a screaming unbalancedness of the percentrage of state championships won by private schools as opposed to the percentage of private schools that compete in the sport. And in numerous cases the percentage isn't even close. That is what I'm basing my argument on that there needs to some type of stiffer regulation on athletes that TRANSFER to private schools. As I said before, a split will do nothing but hurt publics and privates in the long run.