[FBALL]

I hope they don't play this game. It hurts GC more than it helps. If GC wins it's because they're a bigger school and they run the score up(not because they're the better team). But if the Rams win it's because GC is down right awful and shouldn't step on the field. So this is a no win situation for GC. About the GATE? Who cares about the Gate because we have to split the money with other sports anyways. So honestly football don't make that much from this game. Also Copley problaly looked at the transfer situation also. If we don't play this game are kids can't just transfer and beat us.:Thumbs: I hope it's true. My question is why didn't the Rams play Russell during Gross and Clark era???? Could the Rams have been scared???:devilflam It would have been a big money maker!!!!! Just how the Rams filled the stands at the Russell ballgame last friday!!!!:lmao:

I got to the game late but I've got to admit it
it wasn't as packed over there as I thought it would be.

Between 2002-2008 I don't think Raceland would have won a game.

I don't believe either side was afraid to play the other. It's just a really bitter rivalry between the two.

Alot of Raceland fans hate the little brother tag but they seem to relish it too. No matter if they win or lose there is still some sort of chip on the shoulder. It's really just annoying.

Greenup fans still can't stop fighting with each other. You still have the South Shore, Wurtland and Greenup factions. They really don't need rivals.

Alot of Russell fans get caught up in all of the success they have had over the years. They tend to forget that every school has years when the talent just isn't there or it is just young. They think they are destined to be good just because they are Russell.

I'm not really sure which group is the most out of whack. You could make a case for any of the three. But it makes good theater and that is why these games should be played.