[BobCatFan#1]

I'm not making excuses, but Williamsburg had played 3 consecutive games before the first meeting and were literally eating and jogging over to that game. During the second meeting Williamsburg lost 21-16, but the score was swayed by a very bad call. I remember Lexington Catholics varsity coach saying Williamsburg's receiver made the TD and even at the end Williamsburg was driving and ran out of time. But I do agree it hard to justify that either player is better.

Haha... Well that to me sounds like an excuse, but I am going to give my unbiased opinion since I've saw both of the two teams in action (Williamsburg vs. Middlesboro, and Bell vs. Catholic). In my personal opinion, I believe Griffith is a better player, and here is why, when I watched the Bell game Reese was able to throw in the pocket due to his lines ability to block and stay with their man, when he was outside the pocket I was not too impressed. Whereas in the Middlesboro/Williamsburg game Griffith's blocking was not so good and he was able to tuck it and run, throw on the run, and run the option almost flawlessly for a MS QB. It wasn't until the second Williamsburg/Middlesboro game that my opinion laid so heavy with Griffith. The O-line was leaps and bounds better and Griffith was able to still run, juke, and pass outside the pocket, but looked very comfortable sitting in the pocket and throwing the ball 40 yards down field. Reese does have the size and frame for a great QB, but in my opinion he is not nearly as versatile as Griffith and it is very evident. The funny thing about it was when I watched the Lexington Catholic/Bell game I thought about both of these QB's going head to head... Haha. On a positive note both players are very impressive and I think both will go far in their careers if they stick to it.