[vundy33]

How do you get that out of what i said? Did you not read the part where Alabama had been ranked #1 for 19 straight weeks??!!

I hope you're just trying to stir the pot as they say because your statement makes no sense in reponse to mine.

:please::lmao:


lol, sorry to bust your bubble, but your statement is the one that makes no sense. South Carolina doesn't deserve to be ranked ahead of Bama. You said it yourself, they had been ranked at #1 for 19 straight weeks, they don't deserve to have some team that beat them in one game be higher ranked just based on that game.

What's SC done besides beat Bama? I agree that they're a great team and were ranked to low last week, but that doesn't mean they're better than Bama, nor does it mean they should be ranked higher. Now if they had beaten Auburn, this would be different. Just because you beat the team, doesn't mean you surpass them in the rankings, especially when they were #1, and you were #18 or #19.

IMO, SC is a tad bit to high and Bama is too low. I would like to see SC and Michigan State switch places and Bama be at least in the top 6.