[KentuckyHillBilly5321]

The only game they differ on is the LexCath / Bowling Green game. So basically you're conceding that the Massey will have atleast 1 wrong prediction. That being said, if you also count the other game you think both have predicted wrong, and LexCath beats Bowling Green (which is really a toss up game between the best offense and best defense in the state) then the Massey's would be 2-2. So not much of a valid point there. I see the Massey going 2-2 actually. Massey predictions are as follows:

St. X - 28.52
Trinity - 23.85

Bowling Green - 28.51
Lexington Catholic - 25.36

Owensboro Catholic - 35.8
Russell - 26.91

Mayfield - 19.24
Newport Central Catholic - 23.94

You are correct--but keep in mind--when dealing with percentages--there is a huge difference between being 50% correct and 75% correct. How does that make my point invalid? It doesn't--but I see what you are getting at.

Also--when you look at the projected scores--massey is a little more realistic (IMO). I also base this on the fact that his predictions (for the team that I coach for)--were nearly right on the button every time this year.

I also give Massey more credibility because he publishes his formula--and you can review it right on his website (not to mention that his formula is used in many major polls--not just the BCS). It takes all the right factors into account. Everything from home field advantage to out of state wins (with their power rankings factored in).