[ukyfootball]

My apologies, sir. I thought that your question about my education was rhetorical and an insulting one at that. Please allow me to answer your question in the spirit in which it was asked.

[INDENT]Yes, I have some education.[/INDENT]


That was MY point. People are starving in some parts of the world, not from overcrowding but from corrupt governments. There is a pretty strong correlation between political corruption and starvation. There is no such correlation between population density and starvation. Some of the most densely populated countries in the world are among the best fed and prosperous.

Whether gay marriage becomes the law of the land or not will not make it right. So, what is your point?

From the FAQs for the website to which you linked (did you do any reading yourself?):

[INDENT][/INDENT]

Very few of your posts are devoid of childish insults and you should not be surprised when people respond in kind. You attempted to change the discussion toward global over population for some reason and you did not even take time to read your own questionable source on the subject.

If you want to be treated with some respect here, then start debating like a big boy and stop labeling people racists, bigots, and homophobes simply because they do not share your opinion.

I love your vague posts. "I have some education" could mean you dropped out of school in the 4th grade. Nice attempt around the question though.

So because I have childish insults that means I dont know about world history? Once again, nice "logic." (2 can play this game)

And since its apparent that the malnutrition problem deals with people not making enough money, that leads to 2 scenarios or ideals: 1). we truly are over-populated (as previously mentioned), or 2). theres a huge inbalance of wealth, which should be balanced through taxes.