[kybaseball]

Oh no the Grammar Police are back.:lmao:

[PC_You_Know]

It's sad you can't distinguish between your and you're. Don't try to crack on me, you're the one who doesn't know 6th grade English.

Can you tell me what the difference is in "their, there, and they're".

And it should be the "On no, the Grammar Police is back."

[kybaseball]

It's sad you can't distinguish between your and you're. Don't try to crack on me, you're the one who doesn't know 6th grade English.

Can you tell me what the difference is in "their, there, and they're".

And it should be the "On no, the Grammar Police is back."

their person
there place
they're takes the place of they are

Heck I don't even know 4th grade English,funny how I passed two years of college composition classes isn't it? Haven't figured that one out myself.

I can distinguish what I choose to,like you,your.you're not a SV FAN.:lmao:

[PC_You_Know]

Yes, you might have passed those classes, with C's, I passed them with A's, and it's very noticeable.

[kybaseball]

There place? That would be their place, wow you even failed while trying to make yourself look like you know what you're talking about.

I don't know what I am talking about. Or maybe I shouldn't go there not their.:lmao:

Their place shows possesion. There is a place.

[kywldcat01]

It's sad you can't distinguish between your and you're. Don't try to crack on me, you're the one who doesn't know 6th grade English.

Can you tell me what the difference is in "their, there, and they're".

And it should be the "On no, the Grammar Police is back."

Actually...it'd be "Oh no, the Grammar Police ARE back"...whether it's singular or plural.

[PC_You_Know]

I don't know what I am talking about. Or maybe I shouldn't go there not their.:lmao:

Your poor use of spacing and grammar confused me, I finally caught on to what you were trying to say, so I deleted it.

Done arguing with you, just use better grammar, people that don't make this site look bad.

[PC_You_Know]

Actually...it'd be "Oh no, the Grammar Police ARE back"...whether it's singular or plural.

I think you're meaning the case of "Oh no, the Grammar Police Officers ARE back.

[kybaseball]

Maybe I should have done this so it would not confuse you.
their= person or possesion
there= place
they're= takes the place of they are

[kybaseball]

Your poor use of spacing and grammar confused me, I finally caught on to what you were trying to say, so I deleted it.

Done arguing with you, just use better grammar, people that don't make this site look bad.

This site rules state Use grammar with in reason I think mine is close enough. I will be the first one to admitt i aint no english teacher or student.

[kybaseball]

Yes, you might have passed those classes, with C's, I passed them with A's, and it's very noticeable.

I had B's thank you very much.

[Mugshot]

It's sad you can't distinguish between your and you're. Don't try to crack on me, you're the one who doesn't know 6th grade English.

Can you tell me what the difference is in "their, there, and they're".

And it should be the "On no, the Grammar Police is back."

Shouldn't the bolded be punctuated by a question mark?
Just a question from one who received D's.

[09f410nc]

Have I ever said Justice or anyone else wouldn't start for Holmes? I just don't think Knipp would start for them because of his position...maybe you should look at it from that perspective instead of assuming things.

Holmes doesn't need another 3/4 type player, which is why he wouldn't start. Look at Holmes starting lineup...where would Knipp fit in?

1 6'0 Pierre Mayfield
2 6'5 Ricardo Johnson
3 6'5 Jeremiah Johnson
4 6'6 Kevon Rice
5 6'8 Elijah Pittman

Unless Knipp can run the point, he wouldn't start. On the other hand...a player like Justice, Chad Jackson, Thomas Jackson, Remy Abell, Robbie Stenzel, Josh Sewell, Josh Forrest, or Ge'Lawn Guyn (to name a few) WOULD start for Holmes because they have the ability to run the point, which is going to be Holmes weakest spot next year from an offensive stand point. Just because a kid is really good, doesn't mean he'd automatically come in and start for a talented team...especially when they already have someone just as good or better than him starting now.

See Brandon Housely at Holmes this past season...he would have started ANYWHERE in nky and at a lot of schools around the state, but came off the bench at Holmes...why? Because they already had a solid 2 man in Dom Johnson when he came in.

If you want to talk about who is the better player, well he is better than 3 of those starters you posted (J. Johnson, Rice, and Mayfield). I would start Knipp over any one of them 3. I say i would start him over who you think would be the starting PG next season because Ricardo can run point, which I imagine will happen most of the time anyways.

[TheRealVille]

Shouldn't the bolded be punctuated by a question mark?
Just a question from one who received D's.

:worthy: :Clap:

[kybaseball]

Shouldn't the bolded be punctuated by a question mark?
Just a question from one who received D's.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

[PC_You_Know]

I reckon it's about time someone got something on me. I can't keep making you all look bad all the time.

[kybaseball]

I reckon it's about time someone got something on me. I can't keep making you all look bad all the time.

:thatsfunn :thatsfunn :lmao: :lmao:

[TheRealVille]

I reckon it's about time someone got something on me. I can't keep making you all look bad all the time.

I think I gave you a little lesson in grammar a couple of months ago, but you are getting better. :biggrin:

[PC_You_Know]

I think I gave you a little lesson in grammar a couple of months ago, but you are getting better. :biggrin:

Yep, but I had to call this person out, irritates me when someone doesn't know the difference in 3 similar words.

[BlackcatAlum]

If you want to talk about who is the better player, well he is better than 3 of those starters you posted (J. Johnson, Rice, and Mayfield). I would start Knipp over any one of them 3. I say i would start him over who you think would be the starting PG next season because Ricardo can run point, which I imagine will happen most of the time anyways.

I'm sorry, but no way Knipp is better than Jeremiah Johnson.

[kybaseball]

Yep, but I had to call this person out, irritates me when someone doesn't know the difference in 3 similar words.

Yeah right , I know the difference when I want to know, and I already proved it:lmao:

What irratates me is,when some who proclaims they're a die hard fan then jumps ship when they lose.They're the one's that need to be and will be "called out".:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

[dejavu]

I'm sorry, but no way Knipp is better than Jeremiah Johnson.

WAY

[09f410nc]

I'm sorry, but no way Knipp is better than Jeremiah Johnson.

I disagree. Which player do you think will play at the higher level in college?

[letthebighogroot]

Knipp is 6'7 and dunked over a 6'4 kid (Stenzel) that didn't even get around his man until Knipp was in the air...How about we find the TWO videos where Elijah Pittman dunked over Knipp TWICE during the state semi's? hh:

Knipp struggles when he goes against someone his size with athleticism.

You apparently weren't at the game, Knipp more than held his own with the Holmes front line, considering it was basically 1 against 3.

[letthebighogroot]

Knipp and Zollo don't even play on the same AAU team, so you obviously don't know what you're talking about. Knipp plays with DS All Stars and Zollo plays with Indiana Elite.

As far as being a bigger prospect than Zollo?? :lmao:

Unless Knipp changed teams, yeah he played with Indiana Elite......with Zollo, guess that means you don't know what you're talking about either.

[BlackcatAlum]

I disagree. Which player do you think will play at the higher level in college?

I think that Knipp will goto a higher level college. Johnson is quicker, but Knipp shoots the ball better and he is better in the post. JMO

Knipp is a lot like a European big man.

[kywldcat01]

Unless Knipp changed teams, yeah he played with Indiana Elite......with Zollo, guess that means you don't know what you're talking about either.

Knipp was on the Indy Elite roster, but not a regular member of the team. DS All Stars was his "home" team:

Robbie Stenzel, Clark County - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Travis Purvis, Clark County - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Timmy Knipp, Elliott County - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Arman Marks, Eastern - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Remy Abell, Eastern - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
George Fant, Warren Central - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Jordan Shanklin, Warren Central - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Evan Maschmeyer, Jeffersonville - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U
Donovan Kates, Christian County - Derek Smith All-Stars 16U

If Knipp is playing so much better than Zollo, why do I keep hearing only about Zollo in Indy Elite games? Pretty sure he just had 26 points in the championship game of the tournament they just played in.

[kywldcat01]

If you want to talk about who is the better player, well he is better than 3 of those starters you posted (J. Johnson, Rice, and Mayfield). I would start Knipp over any one of them 3. I say i would start him over who you think would be the starting PG next season because Ricardo can run point, which I imagine will happen most of the time anyways.

Knipp wouldn't start over JJ. JJ has a much better all around game, more athletic, and handles the ball much better. Knipp is bigger, at 6'7, but at 6'5 JJ was the leading rebounder for Holmes last year. Considering they had Elijah Pittman and Ricardo Johnson around the rim as well, that's pretty impressive.

Rice has been playing varsity for Holmes since his freshman year...something that is rarely done at Holmes. His name would be much bigger by now but he suffered a set back in the middle of his freshman year when he broke his foot and was forced to sit out the rest of the year. Before the injury he was a regular contributor off the bench on a team that included 6 seniors (Henderson, Avery, Clark, Nelson, Humphrey, Hall), 3 juniors (Riley, Dom Johnson, J. Rice), and up and coming sophomores Ricardo Johnson, Jeremiah Johnson, and Elijah Pittman. For him to see the floor with that group speaks volumes to how talented the kid is.

On the other hand, Knipp would definetly start over Mayfield if Rico were running the point. You'll see JJ, Rico, and Rice all three run the point this year though...that's why Knipp wouldn't start over any three of those guys...and he definetly wouldn't start over Pittman.

I disagree. Which player do you think will play at the higher level in college?

I think that Knipp will goto a higher level college. Johnson is quicker, but Knipp shoots the ball better and he is better in the post. JMO

Knipp is a lot like a European big man.

Don't be so sure that Knipp will play at a higher level in college. JJ is actually a big prospect and will find a nice D1 home. I also disagree that Knipp is better from outside...I don't want to say JJ is better because I don't know what Knipp's percentage was from out there, but JJ can definetly shoot from out there as he shot 35% on the year from beyond the arc. Not bad for a 6'5 kid that also led the team in rebounding.

Wright State, Akron, Miami (Oh), along with several other mid major schools are currently recruiting JJ.

Knipp will have to add a lot of strength to play at the D1 level. He isn't quick enough and doesn't shoot well enough to play the 2 or 3 and he lacks the strength to play in the post. I'm sure this improve over the next two years, but we also have to remember he is a hold back...the current sophomores are much further ahead of him at this stage for him being a year older.

You apparently weren't at the game, Knipp more than held his own with the Holmes front line, considering it was basically 1 against 3.

I was at the game and it was never 1 on 3. Knipp was matched up one on one with Elijah Pittman the whole game because JJ had the duties of guarding Ev. Faulkner and Rico was guarding Ferg...both out on the perimeter. Rico, JJ, and Eli also took a combined 10 shots from outside that game (2-10...Rico 2-4, JJ 0-3, Eli 0-3), so it's not like they just camped out down low.

The big 3 finished with the following stat lines:

Elijah Pittman: 23 pts, 12 rbs, 3 blks
Ricardo Johnson: 17 pts, 5 rbs, 4 ast
Jeremiah Johnson: 11 pts, 8 rbs

[letthebighogroot]

:please:

Knipp wouldn't start over JJ. JJ has a much better all around game, more athletic, and handles the ball much better. Knipp is bigger, at 6'7, but at 6'5 JJ was the leading rebounder for Holmes last year. Considering they had Elijah Pittman and Ricardo Johnson around the rim as well, that's pretty impressive.

Rice has been playing varsity for Holmes since his freshman year...something that is rarely done at Holmes. His name would be much bigger by now but he suffered a set back in the middle of his freshman year when he broke his foot and was forced to sit out the rest of the year. Before the injury he was a regular contributor off the bench on a team that included 6 seniors (Henderson, Avery, Clark, Nelson, Humphrey, Hall), 3 juniors (Riley, Dom Johnson, J. Rice), and up and coming sophomores Ricardo Johnson, Jeremiah Johnson, and Elijah Pittman. For him to see the floor with that group speaks volumes to how talented the kid is.

On the other hand, Knipp would definetly start over Mayfield if Rico were running the point. You'll see JJ, Rico, and Rice all three run the point this year though...that's why Knipp wouldn't start over any three of those guys...and he definetly wouldn't start over Pittman.






Don't be so sure that Knipp will play at a higher level in college. JJ is actually a big prospect and will find a nice D1 home. I also disagree that Knipp is better from outside...I don't want to say JJ is better because I don't know what Knipp's percentage was from out there, but JJ can definetly shoot from out there as he shot 35% on the year from beyond the arc. Not bad for a 6'5 kid that also led the team in rebounding.

Wright State, Akron, Miami (Oh), along with several other mid major schools are currently recruiting JJ.

Knipp will have to add a lot of strength to play at the D1 level. He isn't quick enough and doesn't shoot well enough to play the 2 or 3 and he lacks the strength to play in the post. I'm sure this improve over the next two years, but we also have to remember he is a hold back...the current sophomores are much further ahead of him at this stage for him being a year older.



I was at the game and it was never 1 on 3. Knipp was matched up one on one with Elijah Pittman the whole game because JJ had the duties of guarding Ev. Faulkner and Rico was guarding Ferg...both out on the perimeter. Rico, JJ, and Eli also took a combined 10 shots from outside that game (2-10...Rico 2-4, JJ 0-3, Eli 0-3), so it's not like they just camped out down low.

The big 3 finished with the following stat lines:

Elijah Pittman: 23 pts, 12 rbs, 3 blks
Ricardo Johnson: 17 pts, 5 rbs, 4 ast
Jeremiah Johnson: 11 pts, 8 rbs

I wasn't talking about who the Holmes kids defended!!!!!!!! Timmy defended the entire front line when the ball went to the post. I think his stat line had 6 blocks, not sure on that. He MORE than held his own against a more hyped front line. If you really were there then you know he got BIG TIME hosed on his 5th foul. And last, by the looks of those numbers.............they should be camping out down low, cause they sure can't shoot! And if you really were at the game..........................The blown call I'm talking about...............................well, that's when 17,000 out of 17, 500 were ringing the rafters with boo's. Just so u know

[kywldcat01]

:please:
I wasn't talking about who the Holmes kids defended!!!!!!!! Timmy defended the entire front line when the ball went to the post. I think his stat line had 6 blocks, not sure on that. He MORE than held his own against a more hyped front line. If you really were there then you know he got BIG TIME hosed on his 5th foul. And last, by the looks of those numbers.............they should be camping out down low, cause they sure can't shoot! And if you really were at the game..........................The blown call I'm talking about...............................well, that's when 17,000 out of 17, 500 were ringing the rafters with boo's. Just so u know

Timmy also got away with a charge a few possessions earlier, so let's not talk about blown calls and act like they made up the difference in the game. Holmes was simply better. The only player who had a good game against Holmes was Faulkner. He did it all and was very impressive. Ferg was held WELL BELOW his average. C. Knipp was virtually a non factor. The other Faulkner twin struggled mightily and T. Knipp got absolutely abused on defense. You can talk about how well Knipp played offensively, and he did have a decent game with I believe 15 points, but you also have to realize the kid he was defending (Pittman) had 23 and 12 on him...I wouldn't exactly call that having a great game by any means.

I was at the game sir...and of course 17000 fans are going to be behind the "lil ole mountain team" going against the #1 team in the state.