Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Worst Presidential Campaigns in Recent History
#1
In terms of campaign effectiveness, which presidential campaigns by the two major parties' candidates do you consider to have been the worst in recent history? List as many as you want, you certainly have many campaigns from which to choose. I plan to whittle my list down to six.
#2
Worst presidential campaigns in recent history, Democrats:

1. Kamala Harris (2024)

2. Joe Biden (2020)

3. Hillary Clinton (2016)

Honorable Mention: Michael Dukakis (1988), Jimmy Carter (1980), Walter Modale (1984)

Worst presidential campaigns in recent history, Republicans:

1. Donald Trump (2020)

2. Donald Trump (2016)

3. Mitt Romney (2012, Bob Dole (1996) (tie)

Honorable Mention: John McCain (2008), Gerald R. Ford (1976) 

Note that I did not include Donald Trump's 2024 campaign in my list. I also would not include his current campaign in my "best" list, but IMO, he is running his best campaign by far this year. Unless I am badly mistaken, Trump is going to accomplish exactly what he should in this election - beat a very weak opponent very badly. He has dialed back the name-calling and he has been appealing directly to groups that most past Republican candidates have ignored. Trump has made it socially acceptable for black and Hispanic men to support him in this campaign. He will not win the majority of those voters, but he is going to punish Democrats for taking them for granted until it was too late. Trump is not running a historically great campaign, but he is running a competent campaign.
#3
Kamala Harris has locked up the top spot on the list of worst Democrat presidential campaigns in history and the campaign she is running makes Trump's 2020 campaign look great in comparison.
#4
Kamala has more big celebrities from the Diddy list headlining campaign events in Pennsylvania today. 

Her campaign reminds me of the line, "She was so ugly that her mom had to tie a pork chop around her neck so that the dog would play with her." 

Kamala can't fill a small parking lot without either busing in paid attendees or promising people free entertainment to attend.
#5
(11-04-2024, 11:48 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Kamala has more big celebrities from the Diddy list headlining campaign events in Pennsylvania today. 

Her campaign reminds me of the line, "She was so ugly that her mom had to tie a pork chop around her neck so that the dog would play with her." 

Kamala can't fill a small parking lot without either busing in paid attendees or promising people free entertainment to attend.
You are sounding more like your MAGA KING as we get closer to the election. I see where your MAGA KING is going back to North Carolina again. If it was such a landslide like you claim he has no business in North Carolina.
#6
(11-04-2024, 12:03 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 11:48 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Kamala has more big celebrities from the Diddy list headlining campaign events in Pennsylvania today. 

Her campaign reminds me of the line, "She was so ugly that her mom had to tie a pork chop around her neck so that the dog would play with her." 

Kamala can't fill a small parking lot without either busing in paid attendees or promising people free entertainment to attend.
You are sounding more like your MAGA KING as we get closer to the election. I see where your MAGA KING is going back to North Carolina again. If it was such a landslide like you claim he has no business in North Carolina.
Trump has four events planned for today in three states. Kamala has a couple of free concerts planned in Pennsylvania because so few people are willing to listen to her speeches without getting compensated for their time.
#7
(11-04-2024, 12:29 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 12:03 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 11:48 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: Kamala has more big celebrities from the Diddy list headlining campaign events in Pennsylvania today. 

Her campaign reminds me of the line, "She was so ugly that her mom had to tie a pork chop around her neck so that the dog would play with her." 

Kamala can't fill a small parking lot without either busing in paid attendees or promising people free entertainment to attend.
You are sounding more like your MAGA KING as we get closer to the election. I see where your MAGA KING is going back to North Carolina again. If it was such a landslide like you claim he has no business in North Carolina.
Trump has four events planned for today in three states. Kamala has a couple of free concerts planned in Pennsylvania because so few people are willing to listen to her speeches without getting compensated for their time.
And your MAGA KING has spent the last 2 days campaigning in a sate the democrats haven't' won but 1 time since 1980.
Also, he is in Georgia 2 reliable red states.
By the way you should tell your MAGA KING he needs to fire his makeup person he is looking pretty bad or maybe old age has caught up with him.
#8
Both North Carolina and Georgia are considered battleground states and have been battleground states for at least a dozen years. Ignoring the state would be a sure way of losing it. 

I am surprised that even you would be ignorant of that fact, vector. 

If Trump wins in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, or Michigan, then he will probably win the election. If Kamala loses any of those states, then she will probably lose the election. 

There are indications that Harris has given up in Nevada and North Carolina. The same sources say that she has moved money to Virginia. Kamala is playing defense and her potential paths to victory are shrinking.
#9
Musk may have saved Trump's campaign with his input of money into the ground game.

Maybe we will find out in the next couple of days just how bad each one's campaign really was. I believe the jury is still out on that.
#10
(11-04-2024, 04:32 PM)SEKYFAN Wrote: Musk may have saved Trump's campaign with his input of money into the ground game. 

Maybe we will find out in the next couple of days just how bad each one's campaign really was.  I believe the jury is still out on that.
Kamala has run a horrible campaign and winning the election with change that. I rate Trump's 2016 campaign among the worst in history despite his win. A candidate can run a great campaign and lose, IMO, If the category was"Most Successful Campaigns in History," then I would agree that nominee for the award would need a win to be considered. 

Trump has been outspent and his opponents have impeached him twice; had him indicted and fined in multiple states; and jailed dozens of his supporters. Comrade Kamala should win in a landslide given the handicaps that have been imposed on Trump and that's not going to happen.
#11
(11-04-2024, 04:55 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:32 PM)SEKYFAN Wrote: Musk may have saved Trump's campaign with his input of money into the ground game. 

Maybe we will find out in the next couple of days just how bad each one's campaign really was.  I believe the jury is still out on that.
Kamala has run a horrible campaign and winning the election with change that. I rate Trump's 2016 campaign among the worst in history despite his win. A candidate can run a great campaign and lose, IMO, If the category was"Most Successful Campaigns in History," then I would agree that nominee for the award would need a win to be considered. 

Trump has been outspent and his opponents have impeached him twice; had him indicted and fined in multiple states; and jailed dozens of his supporters. Comrade Kamala should win in a landslide given the handicaps that have been imposed on Trump and that's not going to happen.
Looks like the BGR expert is getting nervous his tune has changed a lot since this morning.
#12
(11-04-2024, 06:06 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:55 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:32 PM)SEKYFAN Wrote: Musk may have saved Trump's campaign with his input of money into the ground game. 

Maybe we will find out in the next couple of days just how bad each one's campaign really was.  I believe the jury is still out on that.
Kamala has run a horrible campaign and winning the election with change that. I rate Trump's 2016 campaign among the worst in history despite his win. A candidate can run a great campaign and lose, IMO, If the category was"Most Successful Campaigns in History," then I would agree that nominee for the award would need a win to be considered. 

Trump has been outspent and his opponents have impeached him twice; had him indicted and fined in multiple states; and jailed dozens of his supporters. Comrade Kamala should win in a landslide given the handicaps that have been imposed on Trump and that's not going to happen.
Looks like the BGR expert is getting nervous his tune has changed a lot since this morning.
You don't even have the guts to predict the electoral college vote. You just like to troll and take cheap shots at people who are smarter than you.
#13
(11-04-2024, 06:19 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 06:06 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:55 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:32 PM)SEKYFAN Wrote: Musk may have saved Trump's campaign with his input of money into the ground game. 

Maybe we will find out in the next couple of days just how bad each one's campaign really was.  I believe the jury is still out on that.
Kamala has run a horrible campaign and winning the election with change that. I rate Trump's 2016 campaign among the worst in history despite his win. A candidate can run a great campaign and lose, IMO, If the category was"Most Successful Campaigns in History," then I would agree that nominee for the award would need a win to be considered. 

Trump has been outspent and his opponents have impeached him twice; had him indicted and fined in multiple states; and jailed dozens of his supporters. Comrade Kamala should win in a landslide given the handicaps that have been imposed on Trump and that's not going to happen.
Looks like the BGR expert is getting nervous his tune has changed a lot since this morning.
You don't even have the guts to predict the electoral college vote. You just like to troll and take cheap shots at people who are smarter than you.
BGR expert I have now told you 3 times Trump will declare him the winner before midnight on election day just like in 2020 which you believed him, but you are not alone there are millions of sheep today that still believe him.

We are not going back
#14
(11-04-2024, 06:23 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 06:19 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 06:06 PM)Maga Nuts Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:55 PM)Hoot Gibson Wrote:
(11-04-2024, 04:32 PM)SEKYFAN Wrote: Musk may have saved Trump's campaign with his input of money into the ground game. 

Maybe we will find out in the next couple of days just how bad each one's campaign really was.  I believe the jury is still out on that.
Kamala has run a horrible campaign and winning the election with change that. I rate Trump's 2016 campaign among the worst in history despite his win. A candidate can run a great campaign and lose, IMO, If the category was"Most Successful Campaigns in History," then I would agree that nominee for the award would need a win to be considered. 

Trump has been outspent and his opponents have impeached him twice; had him indicted and fined in multiple states; and jailed dozens of his supporters. Comrade Kamala should win in a landslide given the handicaps that have been imposed on Trump and that's not going to happen.
Looks like the BGR expert is getting nervous his tune has changed a lot since this morning.
You don't even have the guts to predict the electoral college vote. You just like to troll and take cheap shots at people who are smarter than you.
BGR expert I have now told you 3 times Trump will declare him the winner before midnight on election day just like in 2020 which you believed him, but you are not alone there are millions of sheep today that still believe him.

We are not going back
Still no prediction. You're afraid you can't do the math.  Big Grin
#15
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...eb0b&ei=15

About a dozen Donald Trump campaign aides spoke to Tim Alberta, a staff writer at The Atlantic, about how their candidate strayed from a hitherto on-message campaign to embark on a series of offensive, threatening and self-defeating verbal adventures that have left his team utterly demoralized heading into Election Day. The former president’s predictions of triumph, the reporter who has covered several Republican presidential campaigns concluded, belie a sense of panic among his subordinates that "the bottom has started to fall out" in their efforts


Trump, however, still thinks his chances are the same are great. “He does believe that he’s going to win,” Alberta told CNN’s Erin Burnett on Monday, adding that Trump "has a pretty distorted view of political reality, I think that’s been the case for quite some time.”
The takeaway from his conversations, he said, was that the fall campaign had "been a total train wreck of a fall campaign for the Trump folks."
Alberta's campaign observations were echoed by Wall Street Journal reporter Annie Linskey. She reported that the Election Day mood in Trumpworld has quickly turned sour.
#16
(11-05-2024, 06:12 PM)SEKYFAN Wrote: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...eb0b&ei=15

About a dozen Donald Trump campaign aides spoke to Tim Alberta, a staff writer at The Atlantic, about how their candidate strayed from a hitherto on-message campaign to embark on a series of offensive, threatening and self-defeating verbal adventures that have left his team utterly demoralized heading into Election Day. The former president’s predictions of triumph, the reporter who has covered several Republican presidential campaigns concluded, belie a sense of panic among his subordinates that "the bottom has started to fall out" in their efforts


Trump, however, still thinks his chances are the same are great. “He does believe that he’s going to win,” Alberta told CNN’s Erin Burnett on Monday, adding that Trump "has a pretty distorted view of political reality, I think that’s been the case for quite some time.”
The takeaway from his conversations, he said, was that the fall campaign had "been a total train wreck of a fall campaign for the Trump folks."
Alberta's campaign observations were echoed by Wall Street Journal reporter Annie Linskey. She reported that the Election Day mood in Trumpworld has quickly turned sour.
It seems that the reports of the demoralization of the Trump campaign were greatly exaggerated. Some people are more susceptible to party propaganda than others. I call such people "Democrats."

Rachel Maddow has already started weaving an elaborate conspiracy theory about how Trump is going to destroy democracy as soon as he takes office. But you probably already got the details directly from Maddow herself.
#17
I think the results of this election matched my assessment of Kamala's awful campaign perfectly. I have changed my opinion about Trump's 2024 campaign. Previously said that his 2024 campaign had not been historically great. I was wrong. Trump's 2024 campaign is the stuff of legends. He has rewritten the book on effective campaigning.
#18
Some people believe that a coup happened in order to remove Biden from the election and insert Harris because she was more "electable".

Looking at the numbers this morning, Harris didn't come nearly as close to beating Trump as Biden did. Trump significantly increased his support in the Latin community, the African American community and women. Harris just couldn't hold on to the supporters. I really think that her efforts to ignore the interviews, and not answer the significant questions really damaged her in the election.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Granny Bear's post:
  • Hoot Gibson
#19
(11-06-2024, 10:20 AM)Granny Bear Wrote: Some people believe that a coup happened in order to remove Biden from the election and insert Harris because she was more "electable".

Looking at the numbers this morning, Harris didn't come nearly as close to beating Trump as Biden did.  Trump significantly increased his support in the Latin community, the African American community and women.  Harris just couldn't hold on to the supporters.  I really think that her efforts to ignore the interviews, and not answer the significant questions really damaged her in the election.
I was confident that Trump would make big gains among black males in this election. Some of the best conservative YouTube channels have been created by black men. There are also successful channels run by black conservative women, although not as many. 

Kamala Harris had no choice but to decline Joe Rogan's invitation for a long interview. Had she been a more capable candidate, appearing on Rogan's podcast would have been a golden opportunity.

Like you said, her unwillingness to answer questions and explain her positions doomed her chances. OTOH, explaining her positions truthfully would have resulted in an even worse defeat.
#20
The Democrats wasted too much time and resources on beating the dead horse of Trump being evil, and probably didn't change too many people's minds in doing it. Instead they should have been focusing on and trying to educate the voters on why inflation occurred and what would have happened if the money was not put into the economy. When I heard sometime around 7:00 that the exit polls were showing that the #1 issue that voters were basing their vote on was the economy, I pretty much knew she was in deep trouble. I didn't even bother watching any of the broadcasts after that.
#21
(11-06-2024, 11:58 AM)SEKYFAN Wrote: The Democrats wasted too much time and resources on beating the dead horse of Trump being evil, and probably didn't change too many people's minds in doing it.  Instead they should have been focusing on and trying to educate the voters on why inflation occurred and what would have happened if the money was not put into the economy.  When I heard sometime around 7:00 that the exit polls were showing that the #1 issue that voters were basing their vote on was the economy, I pretty much knew she was in deep trouble.  I didn't even bother watching any of the broadcasts after that.
Messaging was not the Democrats' problem. They saddled themselves with a truly horrible candidate for the third consecutive election. IMO, Trump learned from his mistakes in 2016 and 2020 and then ran a near flawless 2024 campaign. I'm not sure that the election was winnable for Democrats, no matter who they had run, but with the possible exception of Joe Biden, they could not have picked a worse candidate. 

Think about it - the Amish were flying Trump flags on horse drawn buggies displaying Trump banners on their way to the polls in Pennsylvania. Trump voters were highly motivated.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Hoot Gibson's post:
  • sstack
#22
According to CNN, Kamala Harris did not outperform Joe Biden in any state by 3% or more. She only outperformed him in 58 out of approximately 4,000 countries in the U.S., and I believe that included only one county in Pennsylvania.
#23
More evidence that Kamala ran the worst campaign in the history of campaigns. She raised over $1 billion for her failed campaign. The campaign finished $20 million in debt.

Who managed their campaign more effectively, Trump or Harris? Why would anybody be willing to trust Kamala to manage the massive federal budget?
#24
(11-08-2024, 11:54 AM)Hoot Gibson Wrote: More evidence that Kamala ran the worst campaign in the history of campaigns. She raised over $1 billion for her failed campaign. The campaign finished $20 million in debt.

Who managed their campaign more effectively, Trump or Harris? Why would anybody be willing to trust Kamala to manage the massive federal budget?
They finished 20 million in debt  Woah

Dang, sounds like trying to beat Trump bankrupted the Democrat party  Smile
[-] The following 1 user Likes King Kong's post:
  • Hoot Gibson
#25
Quote:The Biden—now Harris campaign committee raised $997.2 million and Trump’s campaign committee raised $388 million in total between Jan. 2023 and Oct. 16, 2024, the most recent date for which Federal Election Commission filings are available, ending with $118 million and $36.2 million in cash on hand, respectively.

Who in their right mind would vote for a candidate who squandered so much money and still ran an ineffective campaign, despite enjoying a funding advantage of well over double that of her opponent?

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)