[Hoot Gibson]

What were have now is chaos. Biden has weaponized the Justice Department in an unsuccessful attempt to disqualify a presidential candidate from running for office. 

Democrats staged a coup against their own nominee for the office and installed a candidate who did not run in a single primary. It is easy to see who poses the biggest threat to democracy. It is whoever is pulling the strings behind Kamala Harris. She clearly does not have the brains to be anything but a puppet.

 Biden has been nothing more than a puppet president as well. He hasn’t made decisions, they’ve been made for him by “handlers” and advisors who script out all his speeches and policies. Some of these people are from his cabinet but many are shadowy and in the background, unseen. All extremely liberal straight down the line. Biden has appeared almost lost and confused when he has been in public view during his term. He hasn’t made a decision of his own to any degree since he entered Congress decades ago.
Now they see Harris as a similar candidate, someone that is not capable of running the nation or making policies but someone who can be “handled” and used for those close to her lurking in the background.

I agree on all counts. Joe Biden never possessed above average intelligence and his current IQ has to be closer t0 80 than to 100. There was a reason that he cheated to get through law school.

Kamala Harris will become a legend among her fellow plagiarizers, once the extent of her own plagiarism becomes more widely known. That story has been overshadowed by all of the other stories about her other shortcomings as a potential president.

[Hoot Gibson]

J.D. Vance sat for a 4 hour interview with Joe Rogan yesterday. The interview should be available online sometime today. 

The fact that a presidential candidate is scared to sit for a long interview that would likely be viewed by more than 40 million people should concern anybody who is willing to compare the candidates' qualifications. 

Being able to communicate effectively in the English language without a teleprompter should be the minimum that we should demand of a president.

When Democrats study what went wrong with the Harris campaign, her fear of unscripted interviews should be near the top of the list.

[Maga Nuts]

J.D. Vance sat for a 4 hour interview with Joe Rogan yesterday. The interview should be available online sometime today. 

The fact that a presidential candidate is scared to sit for a long interview that would likely be viewed by more than 40 million people should concern anybody who is willing to compare the candidates' qualifications. 

Being able to communicate effectively in the English language without a teleprompter should be the minimum that we should demand of a president.

When Democrats study what went wrong with the Harris campaign, her fear of unscripted interviews should be near the top of the list.

If we are relying on who Joe Rogan, then we are in bad shape.

[SEKYFAN]

J.D. Vance sat for a 4 hour interview with Joe Rogan yesterday. The interview should be available online sometime today. 

The fact that a presidential candidate is scared to sit for a long interview that would likely be viewed by more than 40 million people should concern anybody who is willing to compare the candidates' qualifications. 

Being able to communicate effectively in the English language without a teleprompter should be the minimum that we should demand of a president.

When Democrats study what went wrong with the Harris campaign, her fear of unscripted interviews should be near the top of the list.

I wonder when Trump and Vance will interview with Scarborough?

Trump and Vance are just preaching to the choir.  They should be out trying to get the women's vote, which may decide the election.

[Hoot Gibson]

J.D. Vance sat for a 4 hour interview with Joe Rogan yesterday. The interview should be available online sometime today. 

The fact that a presidential candidate is scared to sit for a long interview that would likely be viewed by more than 40 million people should concern anybody who is willing to compare the candidates' qualifications. 

Being able to communicate effectively in the English language without a teleprompter should be the minimum that we should demand of a president.

When Democrats study what went wrong with the Harris campaign, her fear of unscripted interviews should be near the top of the list.

I wonder when Trump and Vance will interview with Scarborough?

Trump and Vance are just preaching to the choir.  They should be out trying to get the women's vote, which may decide the election.

I doubt that they will. Tiny audience with an audience composed of mostly socialists. Rogan has a much larger audience with diverse demographics. If you knew anything about Rogan, you would also be asking why Kamala is not jumping at the opportunity. The answer is obvious to anybody who watched her Bret Baier interview or her CNN Town Hall event. Kamala is the Forrest Gump of presidential candidates.

[TD Hounds]

Again I’ll invite someone to share with us all the joys of Socialism that our country will enjoy that the socialistcrats are trying to give to us….What country that has accepted this way of thinking has prospered?

[Hoot Gibson]

Again I’ll invite someone to share with us all the joys of Socialism that our country will enjoy that the socialistcrats are trying to give to us….What country that has accepted this way of thinking has prospered?

Our wages will definitely start rising if Kamala and her socialist slate wins. Of course, wage growth never quite matches the inflation rate under socialist regimes. They always convince (or try) supporter that their plan is the one that will correctly implement socialism and lead to utopia. All socialists before them just did not implement their big government programs correctly. It will be different this time...

[Hoot Gibson]

4.4 million views in first 9 hours, Youtube alone.

[Video: https://youtu.be/fRyyTAs1XY8?si=kSeP7KiY60tu_yiB]

[Hoot Gibson]

42.3 million views on Youtube alone.

[Video: https://youtu.be/hBMoPUAeLnY?si=g-NEJzAcdCralZIf]

[SEKYFAN]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

[Hoot Gibson]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

I am sure that it will be devastating. When a campaign has to resort to parsing sentences from a three hour interview to make campaign ads, then you know they are desperate. Most people respect candidates who actually answer questions and defend their own policies. Are you not the least bit curious how Kamala Harris would perform in a similar interview? Or do you know what most people do, that such an interview would get ugly fast? She is ill equipped to carry on an intelligent conversation.

[SEKYFAN]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

I am sure that it will be devastating. When a campaign has to resort to parsing sentences from a three hour interview to make campaign ads, then you know they are desperate. Most people respect candidates who actually answer questions and defend their own policies. Are you not the least bit curious how Kamala Harris would perform in a similar interview? Or do you know what most people do, that such an interview would get ugly fast? She is ill equipped to carry on an intelligent conversation.

I don't believe that Harris would fare very well either.  Number one, she doesn't answer tough questions very well, tending to reply with stock remarks, and number two, she is not adept on lying on the fly like some other politicians.  

Vances's mistake was thinking that Rogan would go as easy on him as he did Trump, believing that he was in friendly territory and therefore not being prepared as well as he should have been.

[Hoot Gibson]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

I am sure that it will be devastating. When a campaign has to resort to parsing sentences from a three hour interview to make campaign ads, then you know they are desperate. Most people respect candidates who actually answer questions and defend their own policies. Are you not the least bit curious how Kamala Harris would perform in a similar interview? Or do you know what most people do, that such an interview would get ugly fast? She is ill equipped to carry on an intelligent conversation.

I don't believe that Harris would fare very well either.  Number one, she doesn't answer tough questions very well, tending to reply with stock remarks, and number two, she is not adept on lying on the fly like some other politicians.  

Vances's mistake was thinking that Rogan would go as easy on him as he did Trump, believing that he was in friendly territory and therefore not being prepared as well as he should have been.

I watched the entire Vance interview, as well as the Trump interview. Vance did exceptionally well. A Rogan interview is not something that requires preparation. Either you know how to present yourself or you don't. Kamala is too shallow to do well in that kind of setting. Walz would do better than Kamala would, IMO, but we will never know because neither one of them will ever do a long interview with Rogan.

[Maga Nuts]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

I am sure that it will be devastating. When a campaign has to resort to parsing sentences from a three hour interview to make campaign ads, then you know they are desperate. Most people respect candidates who actually answer questions and defend their own policies. Are you not the least bit curious how Kamala Harris would perform in a similar interview? Or do you know what most people do, that such an interview would get ugly fast? She is ill equipped to carry on an intelligent conversation.

I don't believe that Harris would fare very well either.  Number one, she doesn't answer tough questions very well, tending to reply with stock remarks, and number two, she is not adept on lying on the fly like some other politicians.  

Vances's mistake was thinking that Rogan would go as easy on him as he did Trump, believing that he was in friendly territory and therefore not being prepared as well as he should have been.

I watched the entire Vance interview, as well as the Trump interview. Vance did exceptionally well. A Rogan interview is not something that requires preparation. Either you know how to present yourself or you don't. Kamala is too shallow to do well in that kind of setting. Walz would do better than Kamala would, IMO, but we will never know because neither one of them will ever do a long interview with Rogan.

You have been wrong a lot of times on here. 2020 election was stolen, Cyber Ninja will find the fraud, Trump won in 2020, Iraq had WMD'S why should anyone even listen to you?

[Hoot Gibson]

Vance gave the Harris campaign a lot of ammunition during his Rogan interview.

I am sure that it will be devastating. When a campaign has to resort to parsing sentences from a three hour interview to make campaign ads, then you know they are desperate. Most people respect candidates who actually answer questions and defend their own policies. Are you not the least bit curious how Kamala Harris would perform in a similar interview? Or do you know what most people do, that such an interview would get ugly fast? She is ill equipped to carry on an intelligent conversation.

I don't believe that Harris would fare very well either.  Number one, she doesn't answer tough questions very well, tending to reply with stock remarks, and number two, she is not adept on lying on the fly like some other politicians.  

Vances's mistake was thinking that Rogan would go as easy on him as he did Trump, believing that he was in friendly territory and therefore not being prepared as well as he should have been.

I watched the entire Vance interview, as well as the Trump interview. Vance did exceptionally well. A Rogan interview is not something that requires preparation. Either you know how to present yourself or you don't. Kamala is too shallow to do well in that kind of setting. Walz would do better than Kamala would, IMO, but we will never know because neither one of them will ever do a long interview with Rogan.

You have been wrong a lot of times on here. 2020 election was stolen, Cyber Ninja will find the fraud, Trump won in 2020, Iraq had WMD'S why should anyone even listen to you?

Go away, troll. Like Kamala, you are incapable of having an intelligent conversation, vector. I encourage most people to listen to the Rogan interviews. It would be a waste of your time. You would be lost and confused.

[Maga Nuts]

Looks like the Biden and Harris administration is putting the squeeze on OPEC.

But BGR'S expert claims the Biden and Harris administration are anti oil makes no sense.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/...c659d&ei=8

[TD Hounds]

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room...of-july-4/

---

https://www.heritage.org/energy-economic...ans-dearly

---

https://americansforprosperity.org/blog/...rices/amp/

[Hoot Gibson]

Vector is not interested in any facts. That is why nearly all of the links he posts point to msn (a/ka MSNBC). 

Trump will soon receive the mandate he needs to get his agenda through Congress. Hopefully, his allies will be replacing McConnell in the Senate. If Republicans hold onto the House, changes will be coming quickly after Trump takes the oath of office.