Thread Rating:
06-21-2012, 09:33 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/21/pf/healt...d=HP_River
i looked at faux website but didn't see anything about it
maybe 1 of you guys might have heard something about
it watchin faux news
i looked at faux website but didn't see anything about it
maybe 1 of you guys might have heard something about
it watchin faux news
06-21-2012, 09:49 PM
vector Wrote:http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/21/pf/healt...d=HP_River
i looked at faux website but didn't see anything about it
maybe 1 of you guys might have heard something about
it watchin faux news
i don't think so
06-21-2012, 11:18 PM
$1 Billion rebate on a $2 Trillion program......... yea that's great
06-21-2012, 11:24 PM
nky Wrote:$1 Billion rebate on a $2 Trillion program......... yea that's great
What was it it said, a rebate of about $150.00 a year, when you are paying $15,000.00 on the premiums? Whoop ti doo?:eyeroll:
I can see why nobody would mention it. IT'S NOT WORTH MENTIONING, is why.
06-21-2012, 11:27 PM
It's the absurdity of it
06-22-2012, 12:46 PM
[YOUTUBE="Vector- hanging out at home"]n5BszQSTuoI[/YOUTUBE]
06-22-2012, 03:00 PM
The right question to be asking is which part of the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government the right to declare anybody's profits "excessive."
06-24-2012, 06:16 PM
vector Wrote:http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/21/pf/healt...d=hp_riverit's fox news
i looked at faux website but didn't see anything about it
maybe 1 of you guys might have heard something about
it watchin faux news
06-28-2012, 08:23 PM
Hoot Gibson Wrote:The right question to be asking is which part of the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government the right to declare anybody's profits "excessive."
the supreme court
06-28-2012, 08:28 PM
vector Wrote:the supreme courtWrong. The question of the rebate was not part of the challenge to the law. The Supreme Court was not asked to rule on it.
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)