Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
U.K. forced to share title
#1
U.K. will be forced to share its 8th National Championship title with all the D-1 schools who did not make the NCAA field of 68.

Since UK had so much talent, it is obvious that it was corruptly obtained by stealing from these hard working schools who, due to institutional prejudice and whatever "ism" you may wish to add, had their rights trampled upon.

Therefore, in order to "level the playing field", to " better share and distribute the wealth", to cure past inequities caused by generations of prejudice and lack of opportunity, and to provide for the self esteem of the non-achievers, the NCAA will distribute championship trophies to all these deprived schools.

And, of course, the cost will be paid by entirely by those who actually pay income taxes.

Silly? Of course. But, no more silly than many of the ideas coming from the present administration.
#2
OK, I was wondering where you were going with that. It ended well, and correctly:Thumbs:
#3
Sounds just like the socialism we have going on today added with a little bit of Obamacommunism
#4
Truth Wrote:U.K. will be forced to share its 8th National Championship title with all the D-1 schools who did not make the NCAA field of 68.

Since UK had so much talent, it is obvious that it was corruptly obtained by stealing from these hard working schools who, due to institutional prejudice and whatever "ism" you may wish to add, had their rights trampled upon.

Therefore, in order to "level the playing field", to " better share and distribute the wealth", to cure past inequities caused by generations of prejudice and lack of opportunity, and to provide for the self esteem of the non-achievers, the NCAA will distribute championship trophies to all these deprived schools.

And, of course, the cost will be paid by entirely by those who actually pay income taxes.

Silly? Of course. But, no more silly than many of the ideas coming from the present administration.

Somalia doesn't take out taxes. Maybe you should check into it.
#5
TheRealVille Wrote:Somalia doesn't take out taxes. Maybe you should check into it.



Is Somalia DI or DII ?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#6
Sounds exactly like Obama's economic plan! United Socialist States of America. What a joke...
#7
lol...
.
#8
RunItUpTheGut Wrote:Sounds just like the socialism we have going on today added with a little bit of Obamacommunism

You mean like bailing out Wall St. Nationalizing our banking system... wait that was done under a Republicrat G.W. and now we get to have to vote for Romney Care or Obama Care... so much for choice.
#9
Can of Corn Wrote:Sounds exactly like Obama's economic plan! United Socialist States of America. What a joke...
Four more years, and he will be gone. Then you can find somebody else to bitch about. Unless of course, it's a conservative President, and then you and the other guys on here won't say shit.
#10
^ nah, this country will vote in socialist woman before they re-elect Obama
#11
At the end of another four year term, Obama will have added more to the national debt than all previous U.S. presidents combined. Obama's fiscal negligence makes Greece's leadership look halfway competent. Our standard of living has declined under Obama and it will soon take a nosedive. He is not spreading the wealth, he is spreading poverty that will take decades to overcome.
#12
"Ah boys..." -Zaga Fan
#13
tvtimeout Wrote:You mean like bailing out Wall St. Nationalizing our banking system... wait that was done under a Republicrat G.W. and now we get to have to vote for Romney Care or Obama Care... so much for choice.

Why does every asshole like you just assume that if someone hates Obama there automatically a hard core conservative that worships Bush?
For your information DA we havent had a leader in this country thats been able to do anything for a long time. And as for my opinion, yes Obamas bull shit presidency has been the worst damn thing thats ever happened to this country. So go tell your gay tree hugging friends to vote for him again.
#14
Stardust Wrote:^ nah, this country will vote in socialist woman before they re-elect Obama

I would vote for a socialist woman before i would vote for him.
#15
RunItUpTheGut Wrote:Why does every asshole like you just assume that if someone hates Obama there automatically a hard core conservative that worships Bush?
For your information DA we havent had a leader in this country thats been able to do anything for a long time. And as for my opinion, yes Obamas bull shit presidency has been the worst damn thing thats ever happened to this country. So go tell your gay tree hugging friends to vote for him again.

Briliant...just briliant ever notice that if you point out the flaws in one party you must be for the other party...according to your logic anyway. Or should I call you a name like Hoot calls me everytime I ask for a logical reason.

The truth is both parties are one and the same...look at actions...look up socialism and the Republicans are just as guilty as the Democrats.

Now some will get on here and say "not to the extent as the democrats" boys if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck... it must be a duck. The same with the Republicrats...period.
#16
tvtimeout Wrote:Briliant...just briliant ever notice that if you point out the flaws in one party you must be for the other party...according to your logic anyway. Or should I call you a name like Hoot calls me everytime I ask for a logical reason.

The truth is both parties are one and the same...look at actions...look up socialism and the Republicans are just as guilty as the Democrats.

Now some will get on here and say "not to the extent as the democrats" boys if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck... it must be a duck. The same with the Republicrats...period.
...and yet, Ron Paul is a Republican. How very logical of you to support a member of a party that you detest.
#17
Ron Paul is a true conservative no doubt about that and hopes to reform the party he is in... I wish him well on that endeavor, However, the Republicrats that are there will never let that happen because as the old saying goes "The rich get richer"
#18
tvtimeout Wrote:Ron Paul is a true conservative no doubt about that and hopes to reform the party he is in... I wish him well on that endeavor, However, the Republicrats that are there will never let that happen because as the old saying goes "The rich get richer"
Ron Paul is a libertarian who has no problem with the rich getting richer. He wants all of us to get richer through the free market. Maybe you are confusing "libertarian" with "liberal."
#19
tvtimeout Wrote:Briliant...just briliant ever notice that if you point out the flaws in one party you must be for the other party...according to your logic anyway. Or should I call you a name like Hoot calls me everytime I ask for a logical reason.

The truth is both parties are one and the same...look at actions...look up socialism and the Republicans are just as guilty as the Democrats.

Now some will get on here and say "not to the extent as the democrats" boys if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck... it must be a duck. The same with the Republicrats...period.

Why does a person have to be one or the other?
Last time i checked it wasnt illegal not to vote or not support a party.
IMO both parties have gone to shit for the most part, its just my opinion that the democrats have fallen much more off course than repubs.
To go threw four more years of this hell would kill the country beyond repair. While Romney might not be the man we need or not, its still a change and things can only get worse if we reelect mr obama.
#20
TheRealThing Wrote:Is Somalia DI or DII ?

I think Somalia is one of Obama's half-uncles (of course, I may be a bit off in the applicable fraction). I don't think he is the half-brother living in the hut or the illegal aunt.
#21
RunItUpTheGut Wrote:Why does a person have to be one or the other?
Last time i checked it wasnt illegal not to vote or not support a party.
IMO both parties have gone to shit for the most part, its just my opinion that the democrats have fallen much more off course than repubs.
To go threw four more years of this hell would kill the country beyond repair. While Romney might not be the man we need or not, its still a change and things can only get worse if we reelect mr obama.

I agree we should not elect obama but Romney is the different shade of the same color. Look at his record as governor.
#22
tvtimeout Wrote:I agree we should not elect obama but Romney is the different shade of the same color. Look at his record as governor.



Well let me ask you this. If you had to choose between a cancerous mole with no long lasting effect to your body other than the 15 minutes in the doctor's office to have it removed or, terminal liver cancer, which one would you choose? The point is Romney is totally light years better than Obama, and has the added virtue of not being the end of you.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#23
TheRealThing Wrote:Well let me ask you this. If you had to choose between a cancerous mole with no long lasting effect to your body other than the 15 minutes in the doctor's office to have it removed or, terminal liver cancer, which one would you choose? The point is Romney is totally light years better than Obama, and has the added virtue of not being the end of you.

What makes you think this? Can you point to something in his record. I mean he never balanced a budget in Mass. He started universal health care in his state. Those two points alone make him the same as...

well you get the picture.
#24
At least he's not James Buchanan.
#25
tvtimeout Wrote:What makes you think this? Can you point to something in his record. I mean he never balanced a budget in Mass. He started universal health care in his state. Those two points alone make him the same as...

well you get the picture.


And that's the real problem here, I do get the picture, you don't. You keep circling back to the same superficial talking points, over and over. I think Romney has moved from the universal health care position he once took. At any rate, he knows his support would evaporate like a popsicle in death valley if he tried to move left of center. And as far as budget issues are concerned, Bart Simpson would come closer to balancing a budget than would Reid and the Obama debt clock which ticks to the tune of $48,995.00 dollars per second.

The point is, Romney doesn't have a progressive agenda, to which he is subjected, which would have the affect of placing him in the grips of ideological bondage. Obama, on the other hand, is bought and sold to that end, and is willing to roll the dice by playing fast and loose with America's future. All of the decisions he makes as president are therefore subject to a political philosophy which is, in the words of Eisenhower, "new in the American experience", and in my view extreme. This whole notion Obama and the rest of his progressive entourage has, which I assume includes you, of changing America into something else, is our nation's death knell IMO. See. I'm in the camp that believes America can only work if we stay true to our conservative roots. Romney will surely adhere more closely to a literal interpretation of the constitution and at least begin the process of reversing some of the destructive policies this administration has set loose to begin a sort of 'scorched earth' attack on the American principles and views I grew up with.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#26
TheRealThing Wrote:And that's the real problem here, I do get the picture, you don't. You keep circling back to the same superficial talking points, over and over. I think Romney has moved from the universal health care position he once took. At any rate, he knows his support would evaporate like a popsicle in death valley if he tried to move left of center. And as far as budget issues are concerned, Bart Simpson would come closer to balancing a budget than would Reid and the Obama debt clock which ticks to the tune of $48,995.00 dollars per second.

The point is, Romney doesn't have a progressive agenda, to which he is subjected, which would have the affect of placing him in the grips of ideological bondage. Obama, on the other hand, is bought and sold to that end, and is willing to roll the dice by playing fast and loose with America's future. All of the decisions he makes as president are therefore subject to a political philosophy which is, in the words of Eisenhower, "new in the American experience", and in my view extreme. This whole notion Obama and the rest of his progressive entourage has, which I assume includes you, of changing America into something else, is our nation's death knell IMO. See. I'm in the camp that believes America can only work if we stay true to our conservative roots. Romney will surely adhere more closely to a literal interpretation of the constitution and at least begin the process of reversing some of the destructive policies this administration has set loose to begin a sort of 'scorched earth' attack on the American principles and views I grew up with.

First bolded point: why do you believe this...

Second bolded point: According to you Romney has no set of believes, no principles... I will agree with you on that, now is that less danagerous than Obama...maybe.

Third bolded point: I would change this country by getting rid of the income tax, flat tax rate, end all social programs, dismantle the department of education, as well as the federal reserve, cut the entire budget by 20%. End all tax subsides and kick out the UN. On the second week, consolidate the 600+ military bases. Leave Isreal to do what is going to do to Iran...and mind my own business. Third week increase oil production by forcing oil companies to build more refineries... Fourth week, stay out of the way.
#27
tvtimeout Wrote:First bolded point: why do you believe this...

Second bolded point: According to you Romney has no set of believes, no principles... I will agree with you on that, now is that less danagerous than Obama...maybe.

Third bolded point: I would change this country by getting rid of the income tax, flat tax rate, end all social programs, dismantle the department of education, as well as the federal reserve, cut the entire budget by 20%. End all tax subsides and kick out the UN. On the second week, consolidate the 600+ military bases. Leave Isreal to do what is going to do to Iran...and mind my own business. Third week increase oil production by forcing oil companies to build more refineries... Fourth week, stay out of the way.


True to form, you couldn't be more off base with these three responses. But, I'll play one last time.


Your first- does the term self explanatory have any meaning for you?

Your second- all I said about Romney was he wasn't a slave to some extremist socio-political doctrine like progressivism. Therefore, I contend he will govern from the middle.

Your third- your posts are filled with ravings about Romney and Republicrats, while you have allowed the Democrats their dignity by your predictable and conspicious omissions of any criticisms about them. It's odd in the extreme for a third party outlander like yourself, to continually berate only half of the political establishment. Therefore I assume you don't have that much objection with the Obama Administration and their bent toward social justice, redistribution of wealth and the rest of the progressive agenda, which they openly espouse.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#28
TheRealThing Wrote:True to form, you couldn't be more off base with these three responses. But, I'll play one last time.


Your first- does the term self explanatory have any meaning for you?

Your second- all I said about Romney was he wasn't a slave to some extremist socio-political doctrine like progressivism. Therefore, I contend he will govern from the middle.

Your third- your posts are filled with ravings about Romney and Republicrats, while you have allowed the Democrats their dignity by your predictable and conspicious omissions of any criticisms about them. It's odd in the extreme for a third party outlander like yourself, to continually berate only half of the political establishment. Therefore I assume you don't have that much objection with the Obama Administration and their bent toward social justice, redistribution of wealth and the rest of the progressive agenda, which they openly espouse.

Point One: Romney Care is in the middle?

Point Two: Romney value only what the polls tell him to value...reminds me of another president

Point Three: I strongly disagree with the policies of the Obama administration starting with the Czars and the creation of other federal bureacracies... I hate that unemployement insureance has been available for 3 years running. I think that the "War on Poverty" has failed, just like the "War on Drugs". I also believe that the governments only role is to ensure personal liberty of each of its citizens. I think that privatization is the best source of capitalism. Republicans forgot capitalism 4 years ago...period. Free market, my hindend.

I am sure that you and I agree on point three: however, I disagree with you on the military issue.

Now another question if you go far left on any road, how do you correct your path?

One more question if you do go far left and it looks like you go back to the right but you just went slightly what have you accomplished?
#29
tvtimeout Wrote:Point One: Romney Care is in the middle?

Point Two: Romney value only what the polls tell him to value...reminds me of another president

Point Three: I strongly disagree with the policies of the Obama administration starting with the Czars and the creation of other federal bureacracies... I hate that unemployement insureance has been available for 3 years running. I think that the "War on Poverty" has failed, just like the "War on Drugs". I also believe that the governments only role is to ensure personal liberty of each of its citizens. I think that privatization is the best source of capitalism. Republicans forgot capitalism 4 years ago...period. Free market, my hindend.

I am sure that you and I agree on point three: however, I disagree with you on the military issue.

Now another question if you go far left on any road, how do you correct your path?

One more question if you do go far left and it looks like you go back to the right but you just went slightly what have you accomplished?

IMO going to the right any at all would be considered an accomplishment. Agree? If yes, vote for any candidate other than BHO.
#30
SKINNYPIG Wrote:IMO going to the right any at all would be considered an accomplishment. Agree? If yes, vote for any candidate other than BHO.
No.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)