Thread Rating:
09-23-2014, 03:23 AM
Who ?
09-23-2014, 03:24 AM
Hard truth don't forget go tell Woolf his D sucks. Opinions are one thing but you crossed the line. Keep running coward.
09-23-2014, 03:37 AM
Fear the Nation Wrote:Wow you really are pi**** off. Hope your kids gets yo play thereHe didn't go anywhere, pretty sure his kid puts a raider uniform on. Way to many details while calling the kids out to be in another program. Also that level of comments directed at kids wouldn't come from anywhere but within. Definitely crossing lines, one thing with the decision makers but name dropping is another level. Don't hate the kid, he doesn't make the decisions. Go raiders, win or lose I hope they keep competing.
Sounds like you needed a fresh start. You really should let that anger go, its definitely not healthy. Do you tell your son its the coaches faul he didn't play. That won't teach him how to deal with adversity, running away. I tell my kids to tryvharder, trust in Gods plan. Gavin is a great athlete, since you know so much you'd know why he's not playing offense. Say it big mouth. England's only yards against 2's were Scott county. 1 quarters worth.Do me a favor if your kid gets on the field with the 1s have him tell England he's soft . Better yet his dad films the games find him and tell him. I dare you! I would never move my whole family because my kid wasn't good enough to play. I find that so funny. Hard truth, more like hard crying.
09-23-2014, 04:02 AM
Youre probably right. If he's still here that's even worse than a coward. Great at insults but a little slow on the facts . Meiman and Woolf lead the team in tackles. Sophomores grow.
09-23-2014, 04:54 AM
hardtruth 2015 Wrote:Daddy / buddy ball is still there ... Definition is a player who plays ahead of other players who are more skilled and give the TEAM a better chance to win based on who you live next to : who you hang with on the weekends with : what dad you grew up with or if your dad was a rebel lol..... And I think that's how it works at the next level also ..... NOT ..... because it's about the kids and winning and not about a bunch of has been dads ... Which is why we are now a colonel like many others who have left the nest to go else where to cleaner air and we are looking forward to our visit to the stadium that soccer built !!!!!!!!
Listen... Just because your kid is on the bench gives you no right to name KIDS on here and dog them out. Please have some class. Let me know if you want me to say MOORE on this subject.
09-23-2014, 05:11 AM
Wow. More class coming from Union. I don't know who you are, but you must be a real weasel to get on a high school sports board and talk about kids like that. It really takes a big man to sit behind a keyboard and call a kid soft. Maybe you could search yourself out some class and a brain.
09-23-2014, 02:04 PM
Shocker Wrote:When was the last win for Ryle vs. SK ?
the last win was 2011 @ SK. I believe the score was 21-0.
09-23-2014, 03:39 PM
Daddy ball/Buddy Ball – Who would you replace with your vast coaching resume? Do you really think any coach would compromise winning a game for any reason? It’s completely ludicrous. The defense has been what has kept this team alive. Wolf is leading the team in tackles and is getting some added help from a number of other talented individuals on the defense – Meiman, Belk, Brownell, etc… No one questioned the defensive scheme in the years when Ryle was on a winning streak, and I believe the coach has changed it up a number of times depending on the opponent the last few years.
The best athlete on the team with pure athleticism is a hard call. Is your evaluation based on pure 40 time, lateral speed, agility, skill set or football IQ? Saying that one athlete on this team fits that definition is a rather difficult call. How can you really not see England as one of the top athletes? He could play numerous positions and do well? If you cannot see that, then you are not being objective at all.
Wolf is more than a power runner that only picks up 4 yards. He did have a 70 yard TD run against Shelby County last year and a number of 20, 40 yard gains in other games as well, such as Boone, Conner, Cooper, etc... He never has been a defensive player only, just not the main running back. He did not run the ball every game last year, just as others did not. With only 7 opportunities this year on offense, it’s hard to prove. I am not privy to the line by line stat information from last year or this year, as to when the gains are taking place (1st or 2nd half, 1’s vs 2’s), but there are a number of players that could get it done. Whether players are getting the yardage against the 1’s or 2’s is something the coaches should look at and analyze to see where the productivity would best benefit the team. Calling out any 16 year old boy by an adult just should not happen. Seems like this has been part of the problem for the last 3 years, and needs to end to promote a positive climate that the boys can thrive in and experience success.
1-4 is not a good start. People are frustrated and the team should be 3-2. However, downing specific kids isn’t going to get the program anywhere. Let’s hope the Raiders can turn it around and start to see some positive strides.
The best athlete on the team with pure athleticism is a hard call. Is your evaluation based on pure 40 time, lateral speed, agility, skill set or football IQ? Saying that one athlete on this team fits that definition is a rather difficult call. How can you really not see England as one of the top athletes? He could play numerous positions and do well? If you cannot see that, then you are not being objective at all.
Wolf is more than a power runner that only picks up 4 yards. He did have a 70 yard TD run against Shelby County last year and a number of 20, 40 yard gains in other games as well, such as Boone, Conner, Cooper, etc... He never has been a defensive player only, just not the main running back. He did not run the ball every game last year, just as others did not. With only 7 opportunities this year on offense, it’s hard to prove. I am not privy to the line by line stat information from last year or this year, as to when the gains are taking place (1st or 2nd half, 1’s vs 2’s), but there are a number of players that could get it done. Whether players are getting the yardage against the 1’s or 2’s is something the coaches should look at and analyze to see where the productivity would best benefit the team. Calling out any 16 year old boy by an adult just should not happen. Seems like this has been part of the problem for the last 3 years, and needs to end to promote a positive climate that the boys can thrive in and experience success.
1-4 is not a good start. People are frustrated and the team should be 3-2. However, downing specific kids isn’t going to get the program anywhere. Let’s hope the Raiders can turn it around and start to see some positive strides.
09-23-2014, 05:04 PM
Well said... close the thread.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)