[Old School Hound]

What do you think?  Would you be shocked if the Democrats nominate her in '28 ?  The national polling average for Democratic Primary polls has her leading Mayor Butt by about  3.7% and Newsome by 8.4%, followed closely AOC.  It wouldn't shock me if Democrats nominated Kamala again. Never underestimate how stupid Democrats are at playing winning politics.  They might just go full Kamala again. I will likely no longer be registered Democrat by then. I'm tired of spineless losers. She's a terrible candidate, but that seems to be exactly what gets Democrats hard as a rock.

[King Kong]

   

[SEKYFAN]

What do you think?  Would you be shocked if the Democrats nominate her in '28 ?  The national polling average for Democratic Primary polls has her leading Mayor Butt by about  3.7% and Newsome by 8.4%, followed closely AOC.  It wouldn't shock me if Democrats nominated Kamala again. Never underestimate how stupid Democrats are at playing winning politics.  They might just go full Kamala again. I will likely no longer be registered Democrat by then. I'm tired of spineless losers. She's a terrible candidate, but that seems to be exactly what gets Democrats hard as a rock.

The Dems don't have much of a clue, so anything is possible.  She is a women and is of mixed race, so that pretty much guarantees that around 50% of the voters will not give voting for her much consideration. 

I would think that Booker or Shapiro would be their best options, but they would both have to overcome some bigotry as well.

[Old School Hound]

What do you think?  Would you be shocked if the Democrats nominate her in '28 ?  The national polling average for Democratic Primary polls has her leading Mayor Butt by about  3.7% and Newsome by 8.4%, followed closely AOC.  It wouldn't shock me if Democrats nominated Kamala again. Never underestimate how stupid Democrats are at playing winning politics.  They might just go full Kamala again. I will likely no longer be registered Democrat by then. I'm tired of spineless losers. She's a terrible candidate, but that seems to be exactly what gets Democrats hard as a rock.

The Dems don't have much of a clue, so anything is possible.  She is a women and is of mixed race, so that pretty much guarantees that around 50% of the voters will not give voting for her much consideration. 

I would think that Booker or Shapiro would be their best options, but they would both have to overcome some bigotry as well.

They are both way down the list in early polls.  


Why aren't Democrats giving more consideration to Andy Beshear. He's well spoken, generally thought of as a good guy, is pretty well liked by most centrist Dems and Republicans, is willing to work with those with opposing views to get good things done. Yeah, he's not my ideal candidate but isn't he a helluva lot better than the pretentious ,  Krudmalla Harris ? SEKY, I'm sure you could get behind Beshear, couldn't you? My mother was a diehard Trump supporter and she absolutely loved Andy Beshear.

[jetpilot]

LOL I hope libs continue to not have a clue and realize everybody hates their policies, and just continue playing the victim card which nobody with an IQ higher than a rock believes. Yeah, keep telling yourself bigotry is the problem. LMAO

[plantmanky]

Honestly, I'm surprised she's still alive and they haven't made her disappear yet.

[Old School Hound]

Honestly, I'm surprised she's still alive and they haven't made her disappear yet.

I'm NOT surprised that I don't even know what that means.  Sadly, she's leading the list of Democratic hopefuls , at this point. I wouldn't  seeing Beshear get the nomination but it will never happen. Democrats are not sensible when it comes to winning presidential elections.

[Hoot Gibson]

Honestly, I'm surprised she's still alive and they haven't made her disappear yet.

I'm NOT surprised that I don't even know what that means.  Sadly, she's leading the list of Democratic hopefuls , at this point. I wouldn't  seeing Beshear get the nomination but it will never happen. Democrats are not sensible when it comes to winning presidential elections.

Democrats who hold your political positions would have zero chance of winning a fair presidential election. Their best strategy is to continue to misrepresent themselves as moderate candidates and to rig elections. Liberal positions are extremely unpopular in most of the country. James Carville advocates packing the Supreme Court with 13 members to help Democrats "save democracy." He is right that Democrats cannot win the Whitehouse in 2028 without cheating again.

[Shogun]

Would not surprise me at all if they put her up again. The DNC is a shit show. Not a chance they put AOC up. She would not be a good candidate, but she goes against the heads of the Democratic party's self interest, so regardless of how popular she becomes she'll get railroaded. Kamala is a terrible candidate though, she was terrible in 2020, she wasn't any better in 2024, and 2028 would just be embarrassing. If the Democrats put up her or Newsom then 2028 is the GOP's to lose. Of the people who appear to be front running it right now, Booker or Shapiro are probably their best options. Beshear wouldn't be a bad option for them but they'll never go for him. Not enough nationwide appeal, and make no mistake, Democrats in California and New York and Chicago hate Kentucky regardless of political affiliation because of Mitch McConnell. Democrats have really set themselves up for failure with how they've run the party for the last decade+.

[TD Hounds]

LOL I hope libs continue to not have a clue and realize everybody hates their policies, and just continue playing the victim card which nobody with an IQ higher than a rock believes. Yeah, keep telling yourself bigotry is the problem. LMAO

Your right Jet BGR needs some smarter libs….

[Hoot Gibson]

Smart liberals are being flipped red in large numbers as it becomes increasingly obvious that Democrats' woke, anti-American policies have failed miserably. Hoping that smarter liberals will stumble upon BGR and participate in this forum is extremely wishful thinking.

[Hoot Gibson]

Smart liberals are being flipped red in large numbers as it becomes increasingly obvious that Democrats' woke, anti-American policies have failed miserably. Hoping that smarter liberals will stumble upon BGR and participate in this forum is extremely wishful thinking. Let's be thankful that there are any liberals left to provide comic relief.

[Old School Hound]

LOL I hope libs continue to not have a clue and realize everybody hates their policies, and just continue playing the victim card which nobody with an IQ higher than a rock believes. Yeah, keep telling yourself bigotry is the problem. LMAO

Your right Jet BGR needs some smarter libs….

[Image: https://img.freepik.com/premium-photo/yo...401163.jpg]

[Old School Hound]

Smart liberals are being flipped red in large numbers as it becomes increasingly obvious that Democrats' woke, anti-American policies have failed miserably. Hoping that smarter liberals will stumble upon BGR and participate in this forum is extremely wishful thinking.

What liberals are being flipped red? Swing voters, moderates... okay. But genuine , hardcore liberals voting for MAGA.   Rubbish...


I may very well register as "Independent," but the only red I will be is red-assed and Redhound. Would never vote for a Grand Old Pedophile. EVER...

[Hoot Gibson]

Smart liberals are being flipped red in large numbers as it becomes increasingly obvious that Democrats' woke, anti-American policies have failed miserably. Hoping that smarter liberals will stumble upon BGR and participate in this forum is extremely wishful thinking.

What liberals are being flipped red? Swing voters, moderates... okay. But genuine , hardcore liberals voting for MAGA.   Rubbish...


I may very well register as "Independent," but the only red I will be is red-assed and Redhound. Would never vote for a Grand Old Pedophile. EVER...

Don't worry nobody expects you to be flipped red. That is why I used the adjective "smart" to modify the noun "liberals" in my post.

[TD Hounds]

I truly hope Dems continue calling people (of every color) racists because they disagree with their politics…. I mean it helped them so much in the last election it has to be why they’re silly enough to continue doing it….

---

LOL I hope libs continue to not have a clue and realize everybody hates their policies, and just continue playing the victim card which nobody with an IQ higher than a rock believes. Yeah, keep telling yourself bigotry is the problem. LMAO

Your right Jet BGR needs some smarter libs….

[Image: https://img.freepik.com/premium-photo/yo...401163.jpg]

Ain’t no way that’s you, that guy looks sane….

[Hoot Gibson]

I truly hope Dems continue calling people (of every color) racists because they disagree with their politics…. I mean it helped them so much in the last election it has to be why they’re silly enough to continue doing it….

---

LOL I hope libs continue to not have a clue and realize everybody hates their policies, and just continue playing the victim card which nobody with an IQ higher than a rock believes. Yeah, keep telling yourself bigotry is the problem. LMAO

Your right Jet BGR needs some smarter libs….

[Image: https://img.freepik.com/premium-photo/yo...401163.jpg]

Ain’t no way that’s you, that guy looks sane….

You are absolutely right. This young man is apparently a model from the Freepik website. He looks happy, so he is not likely to be a Democrat.

[Old School Hound]

I truly hope Dems continue calling people (of every color) racists because they disagree with their politics…. I mean it helped them so much in the last election it has to be why they’re silly enough to continue doing it….

---

LOL I hope libs continue to not have a clue and realize everybody hates their policies, and just continue playing the victim card which nobody with an IQ higher than a rock believes. Yeah, keep telling yourself bigotry is the problem. LMAO

Your right Jet BGR needs some smarter libs….

[Image: https://img.freepik.com/premium-photo/yo...401163.jpg]

Ain’t no way that’s you, that guy looks sane….

Not nice to make light of mental illness.  Yes, I am bat shit crazy. One can be bat shit crazy and still smart as a whip and sharp as a tack. I have more degrees than the Redhounds have titles.

[jetpilot]

This girl just got a degree and I wouldn't hire her to do my laundry

https://x.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1954529009871487404

Hopefully UCLA loses $1 Billion for "research" over this...

[Hoot Gibson]

Paper doesn't make anybody more intelligent or more educated. There is a big difference in being qualified and being certified. Anybody with money or a willingness to go into debt can collect college degrees. Too many teachers are certified but not qualified to do anything but draw a check.

[Granny Bear]

I could certainly be wrong, but I think Kamala is sooo over.

[SEKYFAN]

What do you think?  Would you be shocked if the Democrats nominate her in '28 ?  The national polling average for Democratic Primary polls has her leading Mayor Butt by about  3.7% and Newsome by 8.4%, followed closely AOC.  It wouldn't shock me if Democrats nominated Kamala again. Never underestimate how stupid Democrats are at playing winning politics.  They might just go full Kamala again. I will likely no longer be registered Democrat by then. I'm tired of spineless losers. She's a terrible candidate, but that seems to be exactly what gets Democrats hard as a rock.

The Dems don't have much of a clue, so anything is possible.  She is a women and is of mixed race, so that pretty much guarantees that around 50% of the voters will not give voting for her much consideration. 

I would think that Booker or Shapiro would be their best options, but they would both have to overcome some bigotry as well.

They are both way down the list in early polls.  


Why aren't Democrats giving more consideration to Andy Beshear. He's well spoken, generally thought of as a good guy, is pretty well liked by most centrist Dems and Republicans, is willing to work with those with opposing views to get good things done. Yeah, he's not my ideal candidate but isn't he a helluva lot better than the pretentious ,  Krudmalla Harris ?  SEKY, I'm sure you could get behind Beshear, couldn't you?  My mother was a diehard Trump supporter and she absolutely loved Andy Beshear.

Beshear is too honest to make it in Washington, although he is exactly the type of leader that the Country needs.  DC would be more likely to change him than for him to change DC, so it's probably better that he stay here.   The more crooked you are, the better chance you have at getting ahead in the national political environment.

[Hoot Gibson]

What do you think?  Would you be shocked if the Democrats nominate her in '28 ?  The national polling average for Democratic Primary polls has her leading Mayor Butt by about  3.7% and Newsome by 8.4%, followed closely AOC.  It wouldn't shock me if Democrats nominated Kamala again. Never underestimate how stupid Democrats are at playing winning politics.  They might just go full Kamala again. I will likely no longer be registered Democrat by then. I'm tired of spineless losers. She's a terrible candidate, but that seems to be exactly what gets Democrats hard as a rock.

The Dems don't have much of a clue, so anything is possible.  She is a women and is of mixed race, so that pretty much guarantees that around 50% of the voters will not give voting for her much consideration. 

I would think that Booker or Shapiro would be their best options, but they would both have to overcome some bigotry as well.

They are both way down the list in early polls.  


Why aren't Democrats giving more consideration to Andy Beshear. He's well spoken, generally thought of as a good guy, is pretty well liked by most centrist Dems and Republicans, is willing to work with those with opposing views to get good things done. Yeah, he's not my ideal candidate but isn't he a helluva lot better than the pretentious ,  Krudmalla Harris ?  SEKY, I'm sure you could get behind Beshear, couldn't you?  My mother was a diehard Trump supporter and she absolutely loved Andy Beshear.

Beshear is too honest to make it in Washington, although he is exactly the type of leader that the Country needs.  DC would be more likely to change him than for him to change DC, so it's probably better that he stay here.   The more crooked you are, the better chance you have at getting ahead in the national political environment.

That has certainly been true during the era of Obama, Biden, and Hillary. Washington was never more corrupt than it was under those outlaws. Hopefully, a large number of those clowns are headed for the hoosegow in the coming months and years.

If Beshear is really honest, then his best career choice would be to ditch the Democrats before the marches of shame begin.

[Old School Hound]

Kamala is not a good candidate but I would vote for her 100 times out of 100 if it was a binary choice between her and Hoot Gibson. I'm a never-Hooter.

[Hoot Gibson]

Kamala is not a good candidate but I would vote for her 100 times out of 100 if it was a binary choice between her and Hoot Gibson. I'm a never-Hooter.

If you were not a never-Hooter, then it would be time for me to reexamine some of my life choices. I cannot imagine sharing supporters with the gangsters whom you actively support.

[jetpilot]

Kamala is not a good candidate but I would vote for her 100 times out of 100 if it was a binary choice between her and Hoot Gibson. I'm a never-Hooter.

I'm a lifelong fan of Hooters. That wing joint too.

[jetpilot]

What do you think?  Would you be shocked if the Democrats nominate her in '28 ?  The national polling average for Democratic Primary polls has her leading Mayor Butt by about  3.7% and Newsome by 8.4%, followed closely AOC.  It wouldn't shock me if Democrats nominated Kamala again. Never underestimate how stupid Democrats are at playing winning politics.  They might just go full Kamala again. I will likely no longer be registered Democrat by then. I'm tired of spineless losers. She's a terrible candidate, but that seems to be exactly what gets Democrats hard as a rock.

The Dems don't have much of a clue, so anything is possible.  She is a women and is of mixed race, so that pretty much guarantees that around 50% of the voters will not give voting for her much consideration. 

I would think that Booker or Shapiro would be their best options, but they would both have to overcome some bigotry as well.

They are both way down the list in early polls.  


Why aren't Democrats giving more consideration to Andy Beshear. He's well spoken, generally thought of as a good guy, is pretty well liked by most centrist Dems and Republicans, is willing to work with those with opposing views to get good things done. Yeah, he's not my ideal candidate but isn't he a helluva lot better than the pretentious ,  Krudmalla Harris ?  SEKY, I'm sure you could get behind Beshear, couldn't you?  My mother was a diehard Trump supporter and she absolutely loved Andy Beshear.

Beshear is too honest to make it in Washington, although he is exactly the type of leader that the Country needs.  DC would be more likely to change him than for him to change DC, so it's probably better that he stay here.   The more crooked you are, the better chance you have at getting ahead in the national political environment.

Beshear espouses all the same failed policies that have caused Dem approval to sink to an all-time low. He is no different than Schumer, the squad, Pelosi, Schiff, Jasmine Crockett etc. Republicans in Kentucky tolerate him because he has very little power with Republicans having a supermajority in the legislature. But do not doubt for a second a vote for Beshear for any national office is a vote for

abortion for any reason up to and including 4th grade
mutilation of minors' sex organs, without parents' consent and taxpayer funded
men playing women's sports
open borders with all the benefits for illegal aliens including money, lodging, driver's license, right to vote, and more
soft on crime - defunding the police, no bail etc
and tons more

And, packing the Supreme Court and adding DC and PR as states as well as continuing to count illegal aliens in the census, stealing seats in Congress. Libs (socialists and communists) will pull out all the (cheating) stops to try to make sure they never lose power again. And make no mistake, if these people ever get a stranglehold on the federal government again this country is toast for good. That's not rhetoric either and everyone with a functioning brain that hasn't been reduced to mush by crooked politicians and lying talking heads in the media knows it's true.

[Hoot Gibson]

I could certainly be wrong, but I think Kamala is sooo over.

 Most national Democrat politicians are soon going to be so over unless Republicans make a lot of unforced errors. Some RINOs are headed for early ends to their careers too. 

My money is on Adam Schiff to be the first domino to fall. You know, the guy with the bug eyes on a watermelon head supported by a pencil neck. His radical left-wing BGR fans are going to be bigly disappointed. Feng Feng's former boyfriend will be going down with him.

[Hoot Gibson]

If Democrats nominate Kamala Harris in 2028, Republicans may sweep the board. She was a worse candidate than Dukakis. The only reason that she did not lose by a much larger margin is that she ran a shortened campaign. Harris does not gain support with more exposure. She should have followed Biden's campaign strategy and hidden in a basement until after the election. 

Democrats do not have a good candidate to run in 2028. Even if they did, only a fool would run against Vance in the aftermath of all the plea deals and guilty verdicts coming to high profile Democrats politicians. Of course there is no shortage of fools in the Democrat Party, so somebody will accept the nomination.