Thread Rating:
09-19-2024, 11:02 AM
No way Pulaski loses to Perry Central. Zero chance.
09-19-2024, 11:19 AM
The facts are that Southwestern and Somerset are playing the next cycle because they think they can beat Southwestern. They are waiting till the next cycle to play Pulaski because they need more of that young talent in the 5-8th grades to get up there.
09-19-2024, 03:05 PM
(09-19-2024, 11:19 AM)Waitaminute Wrote: The facts are that Southwestern and Somerset are playing the next cycle because they think they can beat Southwestern. They are waiting till the next cycle to play Pulaski because they need more of that young talent in the 5-8th grades to get up there.
How do you know thinking involved on the scheduling?
09-19-2024, 07:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2024, 08:00 PM by Walt Longmire.)
(09-19-2024, 11:02 AM)Medusa Wrote: No way Pulaski loses to Perry Central. Zero chance.
They lost to North Laurel. North Laurel lost to Bell County. Bell County and Perry Central played a 4 point game against each other. There's much better than a zero chance that PCC would have beaten Pulaski last season.
(09-19-2024, 11:19 AM)Waitaminute Wrote: The facts are that Southwestern and Somerset are playing the next cycle because they think they can beat Southwestern. They are waiting till the next cycle to play Pulaski because they need more of that young talent in the 5-8th grades to get up there.
Don't forget that before the last scheduling cycle, the Somerset Superinendent Lively attempted to schedule both County schools. This was during the stretch where Southwestern wouldn't schedule Somerset in anything due to a cheerleading dispute or something. When it was pointed out that they already had their non-district schedules filled, he offered to pay the buy out on the contracts (both Somerset's, Southwestern's and Pulaski's opponents) on whichever weeks that they wanted to play. That was turned down. There were a couple of articles in the Commonwealth Journal when it was being discussed.
Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)