[KYHSFBFan]

Based on the following categories, 1) Points Scored, 2) Points Against, 3) W/L Margin, 4) State Rank(per MaxPreps), 5) National Rank(per MaxPreps, 6) Schedule Strength(per MaxPreps), 7) Overall Record & 8) Final Finish.

Ranking each category from 1-15, with 1 being the best, therefore, the team with the fewest points would be ranked the highest.

According to this calculation, the 2010 would be, by far, the best team, with only 17 points.. That team was the only undefeated team in that time span, scored the most points, gave up the 2nd least points, had the highest margin of victory, had the 2nd highest state ranking and the best National ranking.

For those interested, this years team would be tied for 8th with the 2011 team. While they rank highly in points scored(2nd), they were middle of the pack in all other categories.

The 2014 team came in ranked at #2, followed by the 2017 team at #3, the 2012 team at #4, followed by the 2015 team at #5.. The 2017 team was the only Non-Championship team that made the Top 5, but, they were ranked very high in most of the other categories.



POINTS POINTS W/L
YEAR SCORED RANK AGAINST RANK MARGIN RANK

2004 356 14 282 14 5.29 14
2005 489 11 194 5 19.67 11
2006 445 12 198 6 17.64 12
2007 346 15 230 9 8.92 13
2008 358 13 306 15 4 15
2009 601 8 230 9 24.73 9
2010 737 1 147 2 34 1
2011 588 9 115 1 31.53 3
2012 691 3 217 7 31.6 2
2013 636 6 233 11 26.87 7
2014 604 7 184 4 28 8
2015 532 10 168 3 24.27 10
2016 641 5 223 8 29.86 4
2017 684 4 238 12 29.73 5
2018 699 2 270 13 28.6 6



STATE NAT'L SCHED
RANK RANK RANK RANK STRGTH RANK

71 13 4631 13 2.6 9
31 10 2201 10 5.8 5
62 12 4644 14 -2.8 15
78 14 4487 12 -0.04 14
107 15 6753 15 0.5 13
33 11 2284 11 2.2 10
8 2 634 1 3.4 8
17 8 1581 9 1.8 11
14 4 1178 6 1.7 12
15 5 859 3 5.3 6
7 1 775 2 8.3 3
16 6 1162 5 9.9 1
21 9 1498 8 7.5 4
8 2 1091 4 9.3 2
16 6 1231 7 4.0 7



FINAL FINAL TOTAL FINAL
RECORD RANK RESULT RANK POINTS RANK

8-6 8 SEMI 3 88 13TH
11-4 6 RUN'UP 2 60 10TH
11-3 5 SEMI 3 79 12TH
9-4 7 RGNS 4 88 13TH
7-6 9 RGNS 4 98 15TH
13-2 4 RUN'UP 2 64 11TH
15-0 1 CHAMP 1 17 1ST
14-1 2 RUN'UP 2 45 8TH
14-1 2 CHAMP 1 37 4TH
14-1 2 CHAMP 1 41 6TH
14-1 2 CHAMP 1 28 2ND
14-1 2 CHAMP 1 38 5TH
13-1 3 SEMI 3 44 7TH
13-2 4 RUN'UP 2 35 3RD
14-1 2 RUN'UP 2 45 8TH

[Hatz]

Makes you realize just how good that Danville team was in 2017.

[KYHSFBFan]

With exception of the 2002 team, the 99 thru 2008 teams were mediocre. Those teams still made pretty deep playoff runs, but, didn't have great records, then starting in 2009, when they went to the shotgun spread offense, they really took off. I don't think those teams from 09 forward had any more talent than the 99 to 08 teams, but, the style of play changed and it has worked very well ever since.

[Paradise City]

The 2000 Mayfield team went to Danville 13-0 and came back 13-1 after losing 35-7 to a very strong Danville team that won state that year. It’s hard to say there weren’t good teams from 1999-2008 because of records, a lot of good players and teams competed during that time period. Might not be as successful as the current run but it’s hard to compare any period of Mayfield Football to what has been done over the last 10-15 years!

[rookie57]

Makes you realize just how good that Danville team was in 2017.

Dang, you just can’t stop can you

[football fan42]

You put a Ton of work into this. I will assure you though that by the time the 11th or 12th week of next season rolls around someone will state that the 2019 version of Mayfield is the best team ever.😂.

Seriously impressive research though.

[Hatz]

Dang, you just can’t stop can you

:welcome: :Thumbs:

[KYHSFBFan]

In the last 10 years, from 2009 to 2018, they have won 138 games with only 11 losses, 5 state titles and 4 runner-ups.

It makes me wonder what some of these earlier teams would have been had they went to the spread offense 10 years earlier.

[KentuckyHillBilly5321]

2010 was the best team
Jonathan Jackson was the best player 2009-2012

[Snakesnot]

I just use the ole eye ball test.

Best team probably 2010 or 2012

[KYHSFBFan]

I just use the ole eye ball test.

Best team probably 2010 or 2012

I agree with the eyeball test and these 2 teams. I was surprised the 2012 team was ranked below the 14 and 17 teams. They were both very good, but, I felt the 12 team was a little stronger.

[Snakesnot]

I agree with the eyeball test and these 2 teams. I was surprised the 2012 team was ranked below the 14 and 17 teams. They were both very good, but, I felt the 12 team was a little stronger.

The 2010 and 2012 teams had something the others didn't...Johnathon Jackson

[Snakesnot]

The 2010 and 2012 teams had something the others didn't...Johnathon Jackson

As a matter of fact, if you put Jackson on Mayfield's last 3 teams you probably win all 3 years. He was that good on both sides of the ball.

[rookie57]

As a matter of fact, if you put Jackson on Mayfield's last 3 teams you probably win all 3 years. He was that good on both sides of the ball.

For sure, those runs up the middle of our D wouldn’t have happened!

[MayfieldCardinal]

2019 has a good chance at joining this group though time remains to tell us if they will they return a ton 2010 gets my vote as the best

[KYHSFBFan]

I've got a question for those who have seen most of Mayfield's games the last 10-15 years.. How would you rank the Quarterbacks between Luke Guhy, Jake Guhy, Landon Arnett and Jaden Stinson. All 4 have put up great numbers and, to me, it'd be hard to separate the 4, plus Stinson still has another year to add to his already gaudy stats.

[Kracken]

I've got a question for those who have seen most of Mayfield's games the last 10-15 years.. How would you rank the Quarterbacks between Luke Guhy, Jake Guhy, Landon Arnett and Jaden Stinson. All 4 have put up great numbers and, to me, it'd be hard to separate the 4, plus Stinson still has another year to add to his already gaudy stats.

Pros and cons to each and would probably depend on the opponent and the situation. Stinson for arm strenght, Guhys for decision making, Arnett for competitiveness. Some run better than the others, some have a better deep ball versus a laser over the middle versus a touch pass in the flats. All of them were/are really great. I can't say which one is better, I just know I would be comfortable going to war with any of them.

[Snakesnot]

Pros and cons to each and would probably depend on the opponent and the situation. Stinson for arm strenght, Guhys for decision making, Arnett for competitiveness. Some run better than the others, some have a better deep ball versus a laser over the middle versus a touch pass in the flats. All of them were/are really great. I can't say which one is better, I just know I would be comfortable going to war with any of them.

I agree

[CARDFAN16]

I've got a question for those who have seen most of Mayfield's games the last 10-15 years.. How would you rank the Quarterbacks between Luke Guhy, Jake Guhy, Landon Arnett and Jaden Stinson. All 4 have put up great numbers and, to me, it'd be hard to separate the 4, plus Stinson still has another year to add to his already gaudy stats.

I would rank them Jake, Luke ,Landon and my opinion with no disrespect intended Jaden has no business as QB. He has problems finding wide open recievers locks on too one person and thats who the ball is going to. Takes big sacks at bad times.Is no threat at running whatsoever. Dont get it done in pressure sitiations. Overthrows post routes more than not. And worst of all to me when there is a mess up he always looks to the coaches with his hands up like it wasnt his fault. I know all of you are going to come out and say as you have on the past look at his stats and as I have stated most of his passing yards were because of yards afyer the catch or our recievers chasing down the balls. Also when you have A Kentrey or a Trajon in the backfield you short passing game is opened up. Just not as great as you guys make out

[rookie57]

I would rank them Jake, Luke ,Landon and my opinion with no disrespect intended Jaden has no business as QB. He has problems finding wide open recievers locks on too one person and thats who the ball is going to. Takes big sacks at bad times.Is no threat at running whatsoever. Dont get it done in pressure sitiations. Overthrows post routes more than not. And worst of all to me when there is a mess up he always looks to the coaches with his hands up like it wasnt his fault. I know all of you are going to come out and say as you have on the past look at his stats and as I have stated most of his passing yards were because of yards afyer the catch or our recievers chasing down the balls. Also when you have A Kentrey or a Trajon in the backfield you short passing game is opened up. Just not as great as you guys make out

LMBO, your nuts

[CARDFAN16]

LMBO, your nuts

Maybe so but I know football pull the stats and watch the film. That decision was a pure GC selection.

[rookie57]

So, going forward, in your opinion who should play QB next year?

[CARDFAN16]

So, going forward, in your opinion who should play QB next year?

Have to go with Stinson have three years invested and Conner will be gone and nobody else has seen anytime. I just am not going to be one making him out a super hero because he’s not. But I guess in here you have to go along to get along or your nuts so here you go. Next year he will throw for 30000 yards and run for 100000 no interceptions and will do all this with no receivers. There can I be sane now

[rookie57]

Have to go with Stinson have three years invested and Conner will be gone and nobody else has seen anytime. I just am not going to be one making him out a super hero because he’s not. But I guess in here you have to go along to get along or your nuts so here you go. Next year he will throw for 30000 yards and run for 100000 no interceptions and will do all this with no receivers. There can I be sane now

You get a hall pass

[KYHSFBFan]

IMO, Jaden has the strongest arm of any of them and is accurate, to boot. He isn't as mobile or as quick on his feet as the others, but, throwing the ball would be the last thing I'd be negative about. Plus, he has better size to see over the line and I think has very good pocket presence.

Landon was probably the most athletic and mobile of the bunch and could make plays with his legs or arm. He also played with a lot of confidence. He was better at the shorter, intermediate passes and played his best in the bigger games. Something to be said for that.

Jake was a very smart QB that rarely made the wrong decision, plus he was good at checking off and improvising. He also improved with each year. He lacked a little size, but, not a whole lot not to like.

Luke wasn't as mobile as Jake or Landon, but, had a little stronger arm and was accurate with both the short and long passes. He was also a very heady QB that when he made mistakes, learned from them and didn't make the same mistake again.

All 4, imo, were excellent HS QBs and when you look at there passing numbers, not much separation with any. That may be more a result of the system they run, but, each one had there strengths and weaknesses(although not many) and thrived in the position.