Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proof of Russian collusion thread
#1
Post it here.:biglmao:

"We'll see" exposes you as an idiot. Only facts please.Confusednicker:
#2
jetpilot Wrote:Post it here.:biglmao:

"We'll see" exposes you as an idiot. Only facts please.Confusednicker:

And in case you haven't been paying real close attention, stupid stuff like "echo chamber", "peacockian" and other assorted moronic words of the week that get worn out, kinda drives the final nails on the lid of that notion.

On top of all that, he has no facts.
#3
Bob Seger Wrote:And in case you haven't been paying real close attention, stupid stuff like "echo chamber", "peacockian" and other assorted moronic words of the week that get worn out, kinda drives the final nails on the lid of that notion.

On top of all that, he has no facts.


A parrot can talk, the only problem being it doesn't have the first clue what it's saying.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#4
⬆️
The hilarity is just too rich. “We’ll see” is a statement of “wait and see.” Mueller has gathered facts. From Manafort’s lawyer (and others), one suspects A LOT of facts. But, collusion is one road; obstruction of justice is another. Walk it on back like Rudy, boys. While we wait, perhaps consider that you have nailed your policy preferences to the donkey don, a man who has lived a life of pomposity, dubious integrity, and dishonest dealings in the public eye for over 30 years. I realize that you guys clearly see that the tweeting don’s re-election is in many ways dependent upon the “fake news, deepstate” narrative. It’s politics: “he’s a jackass, but he’s our jackass.”
#5
TheRealThing Wrote:A parrot can talk, the only problem being it doesn't have the first clue what it's saying.

Blah, blah, blah
(wait for more)
...
blah, blah, blah
#6
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:⬆️
The hilarity is just too rich. “We’ll see” is a statement of “wait and see.” Mueller has gathered facts. From Manafort’s lawyer (and others), one suspects A LOT of facts. But, collusion is one road; obstruction of justice is another. Walk it on back like Rudy, boys. While we wait, perhaps consider that you have nailed your policy preferences to the donkey don, a man who has lived a life of pomposity, dubious integrity, and dishonest dealings in the public eye for over 30 years. I realize that you guys clearly see that the tweeting don’s re-election is in many ways dependent upon the “fake news, deepstate” narrative. It’s politics: “he’s a jackass, but he’s our jackass.”



No kidding Dick Tracy! And the fact that not one of your predictions along those lines have yet to materialize means nothing to you. And in that we agree. But I'm so glad you're here to breakdown those profoundly complex statements for the mortals. :please:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#7
TheRealThing Wrote:No kidding Dick Tracy! And the fact that not one of your predictions along those lines have yet to materialize means nothing to you. And in that we agree. But I'm so glad you're here to breakdown those profoundly complex statements for the mortals. :please:

“YET to materialize”... and there it is: “wait and see.” When the feds investigate, they build like scaffolding. We’ll see.
#8
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:“YET to materialize”... and there it is: “wait and see.” When the feds investigate, they build like scaffolding. We’ll see.



Mueller still got you on speed dial? :biglmao:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#9
TheRealThing Wrote:Mueller still got you on speed dial? :biglmao:

Are you familiar AT ALL with federal investigations?
#10
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:Are you familiar AT ALL with federal investigations?



Oh no, not like you are. But then you have an unfair advantage as you and Mueller are so tight.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#11
The Urban Sombrero Wrote:⬆️
The hilarity is just too rich. “We’ll see” is a statement of “wait and see.” Mueller has gathered facts. From Manafort’s lawyer (and others), one suspects A LOT of facts. But, collusion is one road; obstruction of justice is another. Walk it on back like Rudy, boys. While we wait, perhaps consider that you have nailed your policy preferences to the donkey don, a man who has lived a life of pomposity, dubious integrity, and dishonest dealings in the public eye for over 30 years. I realize that you guys clearly see that the tweeting don’s re-election is in many ways dependent upon the “fake news, deepstate” narrative. It’s politics: “he’s a jackass, but he’s our jackass.”

Your lack of reading comprehension skills has again made you look foolish. This is the facts thread, not the "suspect" thread. You keep suspecting but never have any facts. Also, President Trump looks like a choir boy compared to the worldwide criminal Clintons.:biglmao:

Please post only facts on Russian collusion or feel free continue to start more threads on what you suspect.Confusednicker:
#12
jetpilot Wrote:Your lack of reading comprehension skills has again made you look foolish. This is the facts thread, not the "suspect" thread. You keep suspecting but never have any facts. Also, President Trump looks like a choir boy compared to the worldwide criminal Clintons.:biglmao:

Please post only facts on Russian collusion or feel free continue to start more threads on what you suspect.Confusednicker:

Perhaps you distinguish between high level campaign operatives and the candidate himself. A willing suspension of disbelief allows you that I guess.
#13
Lock him up! Lock him up!

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)