Thread Rating:
1 LSU (59) 9-0 1499
2 Oklahoma State 9-0 1398
3 Stanford 9-0 1369
4 Alabama 8-1 1334
5 Boise State (1) 8-0 1288
6 Oregon 8-1 1184
7 Oklahoma 8-1 1138
8 Arkansas 8-1 1107
9 Clemson 8-1 979
10 Virginia Tech 8-1 885
11 Houston 9-0 804
12 Penn State 8-1 725
13 Michigan State 7-2 718
14 Georgia 7-2 657
15 South Carolina 7-2 654
16 Wisconsin 7-2 602
17 Kansas State 7-2 546
18 USC 7-2 502
19 Nebraska 7-2 491
20 Georgia Tech 7-2 340
21 Texas 6-2 313
22 Michigan 7-2 264
23 Cincinnati 7-1 206
24 Auburn 6-3 181
25 Southern Miss 8-1 161
2 Oklahoma State 9-0 1398
3 Stanford 9-0 1369
4 Alabama 8-1 1334
5 Boise State (1) 8-0 1288
6 Oregon 8-1 1184
7 Oklahoma 8-1 1138
8 Arkansas 8-1 1107
9 Clemson 8-1 979
10 Virginia Tech 8-1 885
11 Houston 9-0 804
12 Penn State 8-1 725
13 Michigan State 7-2 718
14 Georgia 7-2 657
15 South Carolina 7-2 654
16 Wisconsin 7-2 602
17 Kansas State 7-2 546
18 USC 7-2 502
19 Nebraska 7-2 491
20 Georgia Tech 7-2 340
21 Texas 6-2 313
22 Michigan 7-2 264
23 Cincinnati 7-1 206
24 Auburn 6-3 181
25 Southern Miss 8-1 161
11-06-2011, 05:39 PM
So Bama drops to 4th.
LOL, does this mean if Ok State and Stanford loses, we could have a rematch brewing???
BTW, they exxpect the BCS poll to be the same although many think Bama will also fall behind Boise in it so the BCS can save there ass and let Boise in instead of two SEC teams playing for it if OK state and Stanford loses, because more than likely, Boise wont lose.
LOL, does this mean if Ok State and Stanford loses, we could have a rematch brewing???
BTW, they exxpect the BCS poll to be the same although many think Bama will also fall behind Boise in it so the BCS can save there ass and let Boise in instead of two SEC teams playing for it if OK state and Stanford loses, because more than likely, Boise wont lose.
11-06-2011, 05:50 PM
I know this isn't popular but Alabama should be behind Boise State.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
11-06-2011, 05:54 PM
Alabama should be right back at #2. I don't care if no one has got beat, they are the best 2 teams in the country. Hands down!
11-06-2011, 05:56 PM
^Bama had their chance, they lost, at home. Cannot penalize teams for winning the games on their schedule.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
11-06-2011, 05:57 PM
^So? Your telling me Stanford, Ok State, or Boise would beat Bama? NO!
11-06-2011, 06:00 PM
Awesome, I'm glad Bama stayed ahead of BSU
11-06-2011, 06:02 PM
Stardust Wrote:Awesome, I'm glad Bama stayed ahead of BSU
Me too!
11-06-2011, 06:12 PM
MisterPerfect Wrote:^So? Your telling me Stanford, Ok State, or Boise would beat Bama? NO!
The polls do not have to answer that question. They have to answer who are the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc....
LSU proved they are #1. Alabama proved they are not. Stanford, OK State, Boise and Houston are unbeaten. They have done everything asked of them. They have beaten everyone on the schedule, Alabama has not. Boise State is 23-1 in the past 3 seasons. They are 58-2 in 4 of the last 5 years. They had one 10-3 season 4 years ago. Aside from that they have been almost flawless. Have they played an SEC schedule? No. Have they played everyone they can, yes. Many reports have floated that nobody wants to play them (What does a great team gain by playing them? Nothing, so I don't blame them.)
Basically, Bama lost. They should drop. This happens every season. Two great SEC or Big 12 teams play and someone drops and everyone says they shouldn't.
I do believe that Alabama is at WORST the #3 team in the country, but because of how the BCS system works, they have to fall, and they did.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
11-06-2011, 06:23 PM
I agree, they have to fall because of the way things are done. But in no way shape or form is Boise, OK State, or Stanford better than Bama. Put those teams up against an SEC schedule.
11-06-2011, 06:45 PM
^Not near the SEC schedule.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)