Most Underrated Team in the 15th

volley_coach14 · 01-27-2006, 03:13 PM

Who do you all think is the most underrated team in the 15th????:confused:

MCfan · 01-27-2006, 10:58 PM

p-burg

raider_b-ball_24 · 01-29-2006, 02:19 AM

SF
BL
they r both very young teams who r rebuilding give em a couple of years and they will be very good

coacher_06 · 01-29-2006, 04:04 PM

Defintly Prestonsburg

sf_football · 01-29-2006, 08:10 PM

bl

PC_U_KNOW_98 · 01-29-2006, 11:39 PM

"raider_b-ball_24" Wrote:SF
BL
they r both very young teams who r rebuilding give em a couple of years and they will be very good

A couple of years has nothing to do with this year. They are in a rebuilding year, but that doesn't mean they are underrated.

**15thRegionCrazy** · 01-30-2006, 12:09 AM

Prestonsburg

sportwhiz · 01-30-2006, 12:24 AM

If Johnson Central makes it out of the district, I'd be ready to play them. If you're not ready to play them, they can beat you. I believe both teams that make it out of the 57th will be contenders for the region title.

halfstep · 01-30-2006, 02:28 AM

Johnson Central! This one group of freshmen that are going to give the 15th fits for the next three years! They are young and they are getting smarter and smarter! They are dangerous this year and will be definately over the next three! Most of these girls have been together since the fourth grade! Tough bunch!

raider_b-ball_24 · 01-30-2006, 09:30 AM

"PC_U_KNOW_98" Wrote:A couple of years has nothing to do with this year. They are in a rebuilding year, but that doesn't mean they are underrated.

well excuse me...actually it does mean they r underrted because every1 thinks they suck and that isnt necessarily so because they are 2 young teams and u have 2 consider the age range here!!!!:redboxer:

PC_U_KNOW_98 · 01-30-2006, 03:18 PM

"raider_b-ball_24" Wrote:well excuse me...actually it does mean they r underrted because every1 thinks they suck and that isnt necessarily so because they are 2 young teams and u have 2 consider the age range here!!!!:redboxer:

LOL, not really. If that was the case then Paintsville's boys wouldn't be "overrated", because they are a young team. And BL has a couple upperclassmen that played quite a bit last season, they just didn't have anyone to replace Clark and Daniels.

themanthelegend · 01-30-2006, 10:43 PM

"PC_U_KNOW_98" Wrote:LOL, not really. If that was the case then Paintsville's boys wouldn't be "overrated", because they are a young team. And BL has a couple upperclassmen that played quite a bit last season, they just didn't have anyone to replace Clark and Daniels.

we aint talking about the boy its the girls and raider b ball 24 is right.and if they r so good then why did they LOSE.

PC_U_KNOW_98 · 01-31-2006, 01:05 AM

"themanthelegend" Wrote:we aint talking about the boy its the girls and raider b ball 24 is right.and if they r so good then why did they LOSE.

Can you read? Simple question, well it's obvious you can read, but an even bigger question, can you comprehend?

"PC_U_KNOW_98" Wrote:LOL, not really. If that was the case then Paintsville's boys wouldn't be "overrated", because they are a young team. And BL has a couple upperclassmen that played quite a bit last season, they just didn't have anyone to replace Clark and Daniels.

Are you sure you understand what I said, cause I don't think you do. raider b ball 24 said that SF's girls were young, that's why they are underrated. THEN I said if age was the case, then Paintsville's boys would be underrated regardless of what they were ranked pre-season. I never said they were "so good" either.

SF's girls ARE NOT underrated.

raider_b-ball_24 · 01-31-2006, 11:51 PM

"PC_U_KNOW_98" Wrote:Can you read? Simple question, well it's obvious you can read, but an even bigger question, can you comprehend?

Are you sure you understand what I said, cause I don't think you do. raider b ball 24 said that SF's girls were young, that's why they are underrated. THEN I said if age was the case, then Paintsville's boys would be underrated regardless of what they were ranked pre-season. I never said they were "so good" either.

SF's girls ARE NOT underrated.

yea but themanthelegend is right this isnt a boys thread so if u want to tlk bout the boys dont bash on the girls

PC_U_KNOW_98 · 02-01-2006, 01:41 AM

"raider_b-ball_24" Wrote:yea but themanthelegend is right this isnt a boys thread so if u want to tlk bout the boys dont bash on the girls

:insane: I was using the boys as a comparison, do you understand that. I wasn't bashing on the girls. If they aren't any good right now because they are young then that means they should be good in a couple years. When they get to that point they might be underrated, but for now they aren't unless they can actually come up with some big wins and have a chance to make a run. Can they do that this year raider?