[SEKYFAN]

Several DOJ attorneys resigned instead of dropping his corruption charges that he was almost certainly guilty of?  I give them credit for not being corrupted by the AG Oggice.  What kind of precedent does this set?  Was this another quid-pro-quo?  

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...b098&ei=68

"What is so alarming about the Trump Justice Department’s actions is that the nation’s top law enforcement officials are bent not just on turning an intentionally blind eye to their peers alleging illegal actions and exploiting the misconduct of a desperate lackey like Mr. Adams for their own purposes, but on corrupting the prosecutors and civil servants in the department itself," the editorial board wrote.

"The resignation letters by the two prosecutors, both with conservative backgrounds, are compelling declarations of why demands like these from the administration are serious violations of democratic practice, tradition, precedent, decency and legality," the board added.

"In his first term, Mr. Trump was often restrained from his most dangerous impulses by people who knew better," the board wrote. "He has taken great care this time to exclude such people from his entourage, leaving it to brave and truly patriotic civil servants to stand up to him,like the seven Justice Department lawyers who resigned rather than carry out the order to drop the Adams indictment."

[Hoot Gibson]

The DoJ attorneys who resigned were going to be fired. There was nothing heroic about people who were about to be fired rushing to resign first.

[SEKYFAN]

The DoJ attorneys who resigned were going to be fired. There was nothing heroic about people who were about to be fired rushing to resign first.

Why were they being fired?  I had not heard that, but is it ethical that Adams charges were dropped?  You kind of ignored that question.  Seems like some were badmouthing him on here a few months ago.

[Hoot Gibson]

The DoJ attorneys who resigned were going to be fired. There was nothing heroic about people who were about to be fired rushing to resign first.

Why were they being fired?  I had not heard that, but is it ethical that Adams charges were dropped?  You kind of ignored that question.  Seems like some were badmouthing him on here a few months ago.

I absolutely ignored the question because I am not interested in taking time to do research that you should be doing before you post these dishonest threads. If you find an anti-Trump thread, you copy and paste it into this forum as if all of the hit pieces on the current president are true. The DoJ has the right to exercise discretion, and it did in this case.

I don't care whether or not there was a quid pro quo in the decision to drop the charges against Eric Adams. If he can help rid this country of extremely dangerous convicted criminal illegal aliens from this country, then I fully support the DoJ's decision - and Adams has agreed to allow ICE to open an office on Ryker's Island to facilitate collection of illegals at the jail.

The more important question for me is why any American would be opposed to deporting rapists, murders, and human traffickers who have no legal right to be in this country? Why are you so much more interested in bashing Trump than acknowledging the truth about the actions that he is taking?

You spent four years defending the most corrupt and incompetent administration in U.S. history. There may be somebody who values your opinions, but you have earned no respect from me.

[jetpilot]

Several DOJ attorneys resigned instead of dropping his corruption charges that he was almost certainly guilty of?  I give them credit for not being corrupted by the AG Oggice.  What kind of precedent does this set?  Was this another quid-pro-quo?  

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...b098&ei=68

"What is so alarming about the Trump Justice Department’s actions is that the nation’s top law enforcement officials are bent not just on turning an intentionally blind eye to their peers alleging illegal actions and exploiting the misconduct of a desperate lackey like Mr. Adams for their own purposes, but on corrupting the prosecutors and civil servants in the department itself," the editorial board wrote.

"The resignation letters by the two prosecutors, both with conservative backgrounds, are compelling declarations of why demands like these from the administration are serious violations of democratic practice, tradition, precedent, decency and legality," the board added.

"In his first term, Mr. Trump was often restrained from his most dangerous impulses by people who knew better," the board wrote. "He has taken great care this time to exclude such people from his entourage, leaving it to brave and truly patriotic civil servants to stand up to him,like the seven Justice Department lawyers who resigned rather than carry out the order to drop the Adams indictment."

You have no Earthly idea if he is guilty of anything or not. We need smarter and less dishonest liberals on here.

[Hoot Gibson]

Smarter and more honest liberals would not be using the New York Times as a news source so soon after it was discovered to have been on the Biden Administration's payroll throughout his term in office. I wonder how big a hit the members of the NYT editorial board took to their income after Musk showed that Biden paid them millions for favorable coverage and their role in covering up his crackhead son's crimes?

The BGR liberals (including its self-proclaimed communist) have no shame.