[Red and Black]

Those lineman had 0 in game experience before this year and they had 0 skills that started on varsity play jv

Did MC not have any skill guys with 0 in game varsity experience? Why didn't those guys play JV too?

They had a few that started jv that got varsity reps but no starting skill players in jv stated on varsity.

Were all of MC's varsity skill players on the '24 team returning starters from the '23 team? Somehow, I doubt that. If the argument is that it's ok to start varsity linemen on JV because they have no varsity experience then why not also start varsity skill kids on JV if they have no previous varsity experience as well? I don't understand the logic of being OK with doing it for one position group and not the others.

Most the skills where juniors and seniors and they didn't play a single snap on jv. All sophomores and freshman.  I know it's tough for u all over there at pburg to wrap up head around this. I don't know what the big deal is anyways

It’s true that Pburg won 11 games with a majority of freshman and sophomore starters on both sides of the ball in varsity play last year, so maybe that’s the disconnect between us. Especially since Coach Hager seemed to not want many or most of those kids to play both JV and varsity too. Maybe that’s why it’s hard for us to wrap our heads around MC playing most of their varsity linemen on JV over here.

But, you’re right, by all means teams should play whoever they want in JV. There are basically no khsaa rules against it and it’s really not a big deal, but I just don’t understand how some people on here expect sensible people to believe that a JV team is great when it has to load it up with varsity players to beat rivals who don’t even play their freshman and sophomores who see a lot of varsity snaps on JV. I’ll leave it at that.

[TE#82]

Did MC not have any skill guys with 0 in game varsity experience? Why didn't those guys play JV too?

They had a few that started jv that got varsity reps but no starting skill players in jv stated on varsity.

Were all of MC's varsity skill players on the '24 team returning starters from the '23 team? Somehow, I doubt that. If the argument is that it's ok to start varsity linemen on JV because they have no varsity experience then why not also start varsity skill kids on JV if they have no previous varsity experience as well? I don't understand the logic of being OK with doing it for one position group and not the others.

Most the skills where juniors and seniors and they didn't play a single snap on jv. All sophomores and freshman.  I know it's tough for u all over there at pburg to wrap up head around this. I don't know what the big deal is anyways

It’s true that Pburg won 11 games with a majority of freshman and sophomore starters on both sides of the ball in varsity play last year, so maybe that’s the disconnect between us. Especially since Coach Hager seemed to not want many or most of those kids to play both JV and varsity too. Maybe that’s why it’s hard for us to wrap our heads around MC playing most of their varsity linemen on JV over here.

But, you’re right, by all means teams should play whoever they want in JV. There are basically no khsaa rules against it and it’s really not a big deal, but I just don’t understand how some people on here expect sensible people to believe that a JV team is great when it has to load it up with varsity players to beat rivals who don’t even play their freshman and sophomores who see a lot of varsity snaps on JV. I’ll leave it at that.

I think ur letting it get to u a little to much my guy. But if Wesley don't take advantage and get some of his younger players snaps in jv that's on him. That's his program and he can run it as he sees fit. I'm a huge Wesley hager fan. He is a fine coach but I don't believe for 1 second he didn't play any varsity players on jv. I agree not to play varsity juniors and seniors. But underclassmen need all the snaps they can get

[Khalisimo]

who cares about jv records and who played what?????