[Hoot Gibson]

Another lose for the Dear Leader and his flock

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

wait!!!  

Weren’t these the lead pipe locks @Hoot Gibson said were going to prove Democrats stole the election??!!

no way. No.  

Boys, we’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, hornswoogled, snookered, buffaloed....none of this was election fraud was real.

You've done all the hornswoggling to yourself. There was never going to be a way to verify mail-in ballots in the best of situations. Towards the end, Dems were so cavalier about it they abandoned all form and/or fashion of even the appearance of trying to do things legally, and just did anything they darn well pleased. But ballots found in a duffel bag laying on a public bench, or harvested, or picked up by who knows who from makeshift cardboard drop boxes or 'gathered' by any unorthodox means and delivered in rusted out unmared vans with out of state tags and the fenders flapping, should not have been allowed. But as with every other point of contention between rabid libs and conservatives, even though there is established law on all these matters, where that law runs contrary to the interests of the left, it's simply ignored. On the other hand if the left wants to control conservatives they are sharp enough about the law to use it as a weapon against Republicans.

For anyone who wasn't happy to surf the kool-aid, the swing state 2am ballot drops and the hundreds of thousands of unfolded, unsigned, undated one check marked ballots for Biden only-- caused great concern about legitimacy even under the new moronic guidelines. Did I mention that in order for ballots to be considered valid they must be accompanied by the envelopes in which they were supposedly mailed? And that those envelopes were all summarily disposed of; all by actors unknown? That's illegal. Nonetheless though rational people would have known better, rather than having internet trolls the likes of you guys on here trying to argue down the right by virtue of 24/7 campaign using persistence your only weapon;  had at least a few applicable forensic audits been performed. And had the courts accepted even a few cases to be heard, and not just taken the collaborative/coward's way out with the ridiculous finding that the people didn't have standing. If the audits were not revelatory, and if the cases were found to be based on vapor as is the unsupported claim, the left could have claimed victory and the right would have had to shut up about it. But no, it was a 100% stonewall.

The dishonesty of the liberals who participate in this forum prevent them from examining any evidence that contradicts their party's position that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud. It doesn't matter how many videos exist or how many experts confirm that Dominion's voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden, as long as the Supreme Court refuses to even peek at the evidence that has been filed, liberals are going to behave like the happy mushrooms that they are. The thing is, no matter how accommodating the Supreme Court is to China Joe and the Democrat-controlled Congress is, they will likely pack the court anyway. Generations of Republican elected officials proved that compromising with Democrats is counterproductive. Like despots the world over the only thing Democrats respond to is the credible threat of the exercise of raw power.