[Cardfan1]

“Essentially, the ruling would be 'You have to go to the streets and be as violent as antifa, BLM”

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/53240...-dismissed

The party of “law and order” is spiraling. GOP punted on morals with Trump, but now we have a Rep. calling for violence in the streets.

DJT has destroyed the Republican Party.

Leaving aside your own attempt at making nonsensical argument in the previous post above.

The left used violence to get their way, as I just said in another thread, when normal channels proved unfruitful to that end. So you expect that the left can be violent and win, but the right just has to lay down and take it or then they become the ones who assume the ignoble mantle of perpetrator?

Any number of Dems have called for violence in the streets to include the Speaker of the House. I didn't see where you had any concerns about the lawful estate of your own party when the dozens of public servants made their similar public statements. That's having it both ways. You never heard the proverb 'live by the sword die by the sword'?

I doubt you will ever see a meaningful, concerted, organized, siege of violence from conservatives anywhere near to what we have witnessed out of the left. But we did see it from the left and you were on here calling it protected speech and peaceful protest which of course, was a lie.

Any Dem that called for violence in the streets is wrong.  I’ve said that here and most Dems have said the same.  

You and other conservatives have wailed for months about the violence resulting from protests, but now that Goobert is calling for violence for DJT it’s ok. 

There are conservative groups descending on Washington D.C. with orders from a Texas congressman to be violent and from the President to be wild.  Lots of talk online about what they are going to do.  Maybe there won’t be violence.  I pray there isn’t, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.  Lots of blabber mouths have riled some demented people up for political and financial gain with zero facts.