[Hoot Gibson]

I don't put all the blame on the Dear Leader he just took advantage of the situation

Lot of the blame starts with Fox News and now Social Media the Hoopleheads will believe everything they see if it suits there view without trying to check out if it's true or not

Also they are scared of brown america and change

The party of Lincoln has moved more to the party of Jefferson the last 60 years

---

The courts are not dismissing the cases on the evidence

They are dismissing them on NO evidence Dammm you are a Hooplehead

---

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the Court dismisses a
complaint, in whole or in part, if the plaintiff has failed to “state a claim upon
which relief can be granted.”
They have nothing

---

Her is a good example of the lies Hooter is spreading

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...d=msedgdhp

You copied and pasted a portion of a federal law that does not address evidence and then claimed that the rule proves that no evidence has been presented to the courts. If you cannot understand FRC 12(b)(6), then it would be a waste of your time to actually try reading a court filing or decision. Reading your posts is like watching somebody who can't swim repeatedly jump into deep water without a floatie.

"Relief" means a legal remedy, just compensation, etc. I voted in Virginia. If I file a federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State for running a rigged election based on a violation of my constitutional rights, a federal district court in Virginia would dismiss my suit because: 1) I would lack legal standing because no matter how much evidence I have that the Georgia SoS ran a crooked election, his actions were not responsible for me voting in a rigged election in Virginia. 2) The federal district court in Virginia would not have jurisdiction over a state official running a rigged election in Georgia. 

The evidence in my example would not matter. I would have no legal standing and the court would have no jurisdiction, so therefore the federal district court in Virginia would be unable to grant me any relief, even if all of my allegations were true. The court would ignore my evidence.

The Texas Supreme Court case against Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin was dismissed because a majority of the justices determined that the state of Texas lacked legal standing to interfere in another state's election. Whatever the real reason for dismissing the case was, it had nothing to do with the evidence because the court never considered the evidence.