[Hoot Gibson]

Lie?  What lie?  You always say that but you never prove the lie.  However, You are presenting misleading information as valid medical advice that doctors should be following.   

dude, you act like there is some type of conspiracy that prevents the medical community from encouraging the use of Ivermectin.  It's silly.

Doctors are telling people not to use it because it is not proven to work and the side effects outweigh the benefits.

More lies and half-truths. What I am doing is exposing you for spreading disinformation again, and I have done so very successfully. You have been ridiculing people for taking and doctors for prescribing ivermectin, claiming that it is dangerous and that there is no evidence that it works. All I have done is prove that there is enough evidence that it works that it is being widely used in other countries and the results have led to full clinical trials that are ongoing. All you have done is post one lie after another to distract from the fact that you are in the wrong again.

You are correct that some doctors art telling people not to use ivermectin but as I have proven, other very reputable doctors have prescribed ivermectin and/or urged governments to approve its use.

At least you are very subtly changing your tone and language. "It is not proven to work" leaves you some wiggle room in case ongoing studies do prove its efficacy that you did not have with your previous statements.

My point is that people who take ivermectin prescribed by a doctor are generally not the rubes that you claimed them to be. Obviously, if somebody takes drugs intended for horses in doses large enough for horses, they run the risk of a quick death. No reputable doctor is suggesting that people resort to animal-grade ivermectin to treat coronavirus infections.

I’m not changing my tone.  
and what half-truth?  

MOST doctors and MOST public health agencies are discouraging the use of Ivermectin for the Rona.   

good lord what’s next? You guys have gone from one quack to the next. 

(Nice word, Hooter)

Rubes.

Your position is "evolving." If studies prove that ivermectin is effective, then you will claim that you never said it wasn't and call everybody liars who dispute your claim. Why? Because, as Obama might say, that is who you are. You are most often wrong but not man enough to admit it when you are proven wrong.

Sorry it’s not. My position is the same.  

I lean with the majority of health professionals that say Ivermectin’s cons outweigh the pros. 

But go ahead. Push it on your like thinkers, Hooter. Maybe it will work out or maybe it won’t.  

You love your African studies why don’t you look up the one that found 85% of those treated with ivermectin for river blindness became sterile.



oh boy…

---

[Video: http://https://youtu.be/HLtCBvKI_Mc]

---

I'm not wasting my time watching your propaganda.