[TheRealThing]

Nancy Pelosi agrees. Basement Biden should refuse to debate President Trump.

Biden's only chance of winning is to stay in his basement, refuse to debate, and then refuse to concede defeat. If Biden's mind was not shot, then he might be insulted by the lack of confidence Democrats have in his ability to beat Trump in a fair election.

His Dem handlers will never allow Biden to debate the President. Because they know even prep'd with foreknowledge of the questions, and having been drilled how to answer those questions, Biden's bumbling in the eyes of the people would be catastrophic. And if the media worked with Donna Brazile to prep Obama, you can bet the ranch they'd do it again with Biden. During the 2nd debate  Candace Crowley had clearly set something up with Obama to back up his extremely obscure and detached Rose garden remark when he supposedly called the Benghazi attack 'terrorism.' I mean, she already had it bookmarked in her notes and the page turned to and ready to read from. Moderators were not allowed to help a candidate, but they did it anyway.  Frankly, if plain evidence serves you could name any political subject, free and fair elections, honesty in government and accountability to the people, accepting the will of the people as in the last election results and in the case of defining marriage as between one man and one woman, the judiciary as in the case of Gen Flynn, presidential debates, the open calling for insurrection and further rioting, it all just goes to show, if the Dems are involved in anything, there will be cheating going on.

If I were Trump I'd be very choosy about participating in the same sort of hit job Mitt Romney was subjected to anyway.

I don't think that Democrats will have any choice but to let Biden participate in debates. I think what is going on now is that they are working to lower voters' expectations. I still expect the debates to be a disaster for Biden, even with the moderators feeding him with softball questions and attacking Trump as rude, dishonest, etc. in the post-debate analyses. At some point, most people begin to believe their own eyes and ears.

I hope you're right. Pelosi's advice to Biden not to debate at this point could be self serving I suppose. One has to wonder if her real interest in all this, is in the slim possibility that given enough confusion, she could ascend to the Presidency herself.

It seems like the left is 'working' as you say right now, to prepare the public for the possibility of the left's ultimate nut house coup. Judge Napolitano (not that I vest a lot in most of the things he goes on about) but he says this could happen; if the electoral college doesn't declare a winner in the coming election by Jan 20th while we're supposedly waiting indefinitely for election returns, Pelosi would become President. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-...napolitano

As I understand it, the Constitution is very clear on the timeline for casting and counting Electoral votes. The issue would probably go to the Supreme Court but unless they manufacture a law, ballots that could not be validated as being cast on Election Day would be disregarded. States could opt to change the process of how electors are selected through emergency legislation to make sure that their electoral votes are cast, but if they failed to send electors, then they would be out of luck. It is difficult for me to imagine a process where Pelosi would be seated as the President.

I think that if Trump wins reelection we will be in for four more years of whining by Democrats about how he stole the election and how millions of people were disenfranchised. Maybe that is our future. where Democrats either win or refuse to acknowledge defeat. They are certainly working hard on fine tuning their sore loser tactics. Maybe this USPS sham is all about building support to eliminate the Electoral College. If thousands or millions of votes go uncounted because of a process that they created themselves, there will be no end to their whining.

I don't consider Judge Napolitano much of a constitutional expert. I have not heard Mark Levin's analysis yet but I believe that he is a much more credible source for constitutional law. Napolitano is just a few notches above Obama, IMO.

Correct. You, I and many others understand that, but does Pelosi? LOL